Skip to main content
Download PDF

Canine sperm motility is associated with telomere shortening and changes in expression of shelterin genes

BMC Veterinary Research volume 19, Article number: 236 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Motion quality is a critical property for essential functions. Several endogenous and exogenous factors are involved in sperm motility. Here, we measured the relative telomere length and evaluated the gene expression of its binding-proteins, shelterin complex (TRF1, TRF2, RAP1, POT1, TIN2, and TPP1) in sperm of dogs using relative quantitative real-time PCR. We compared them between two sperm subpopulations with poor and good motion qualities (separated by swim-up method). Telomere shortening and alterations of shelterin gene expression result from ROS, genotoxic insults, and genetic predisposition.

Results

Sperm kinematic parameters were measured in two subpopulations and then telomeric index of each parameter was calculated. Telomeric index for linearity, VSL, VCL, STR, BCF, and ALH were significantly higher in sperms with good motion quality than in sperms with poor quality. We demonstrated that poor motion quality is associated with shorter telomere, higher expression of TRF2, POT1, and TIN2 genes, and lower expression of the RAP1 gene in dog sperm. The levels of TRF1 and TPP1 gene expression remained consistent despite variations in sperm quality and telomere length.

Conclusion

Data provided evidence that there are considerable changes in gene expression of many shelterin components (TRF2, TIN2, POT1and RAP1) associated with shortening telomere in the spermatozoa with poor motion quality. Possibly, the poor motion quality is the result of defects in the shelterin complex and telomere length. Our data suggests a new approach in the semen assessment and etiologic investigations of subfertility or infertility in male animals.

Peer Review reports

Background

Fertility problems sometimes occur in male animals during their reproductive activation. In the canine breeding industry, infertility results in substantial financial losses for dog owners, and a complete breeding soundness evaluation is necessary for detection of the causes [1]. A critical factor in sperm assessment is kinematic parameters that are essential for the spermatozoa to migrate toward the fertilization site in the oviduct and to pass across the zona pellucida both in vivo and in vitro. Thus it has been noticed as a critical factor in determining fertilization rate [2]. Potent sperm motility facilitates fertilization via better passing of sperm across the cumulus cell, corona radiate, and finally, the zona pellucida. It has been confirmed that sperm motility is strongly influenced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) in seminal plasma causing mitochondrial disorders [3, 4], structural malformation in the flagella [5], and DNA damage [6]. Numerous studies have demonstrated a correlation between telomere shortening and the occurrence of sperm DNA damage, hence implicating that this phenomenon may contribute to male infertility [7].

Telomere structure consists of short, tandem repeats of DNA sequence that cover linear chromosome ends by linking members of the shelterin protein complex to provide protective telomere loops. An inadequate number of telomere repeats causes chromosome uncapping, cell aging, and death [8]. During meiosis of germ cells, telomeres play vital roles in the protection of chromosome ends from nucleolytic degradation/fusion and in tethering chromosomes together to the nuclear envelope. It is also necessary for prosperous synapsis between homologs as well as for the proper resolution of recombination events [9].

Telomere shortening results from ROS, genotoxic insults, and genetic predisposition. ROS destroys telomeres via oxidizing its guanine-rich parts; thereby promoting a DNA damage response, which leads to the excision of telomere repeats [10] and then biological aging [11]. It has been determined that gene mutations involving telomerase activity or telomere stability lead to the occurrence of many clinical disorders (named telomeropathies) in germline cells. These disorders often originate from short or malfunction telomeres [12].

Shelterin is a protein complex known to protect telomeres. Six proteins, telomere repeat binding factor 1 and 2 (TRF1 / TRF2), repressor/activator protein 1 (RAP1), TRF-interacting nuclear protein 2 (TIN2), telomere protection protein 1 (TPP1), and protection of telomeres 1 (POT1), form the shelterin complex, that is a fundamental part of telomeres [13]. The TRF1/TRF2 homodimer joins double-stranded telomeric repeats while POT1 connects to the single-stranded telomeric 3′ overhang. TIN2 links, through protein interactions, TRF1, TRF2, and TPP1. TPP1 joins, in addition, to POT1, therefore recruiting POT1 also to the double-stranded segment of telomeres [14]. RAP1 relates to telomeres through interaction with TRF2. POT1 also binds directly to TRF2. The shelterin complex plays a vital role in both telomere stability and cell signaling reactions. Disturbing expression levels of shelterin members mainly affect the telomere length [14].

In this study, we separated spermatozoa from dog semen by swim-up method and classified them into good and poor motion qualities, namely the top-layer (TL) and bottom-layer (BL) sperm group respectively. Their relative telomere length and expression of shelterin genes (TRF1, TRF2, RAP1, POT1, TIN2, and TPP1) were measured, and compared between two sperm subpopulations. This study aimed to investigate the involvement of telomere length and shelterin proteins in sperm motion quality.

Results

Sperm kinematic parameters

Table 1 indicates the kinematic parameters for sperm subpopulations of top and bottom layers after swim-up. Sperm parameters of total motility, progressive motility, linearity, VSL, VCL, STR, BCF, and ALH were significantly more in the TL-sperm group than in the BL-sperm group. In contrast, the parameter of non-motility was less.

Table 1 Comparison of kinematic parameters between sperm subpopulations of top and bottom layers after swim-up
Full size table

Sperm telomere length and telomere index of kinematic parameters

Figure 1. shows the relative amounts of telomere length for sperm subpopulations of top and bottom layers after swim-up. Mean telomere length was significantly more in the TL-sperm group than in the BL-sperm group (P < 0.05).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of relative telomere length between sperm subpopulations of top (green diamond) and bottom (red brick) layers after swim-up. Data are given as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). * Significant difference between two groups (P < 0.001)

Full size image

Figure 2. displays the telomeric index of sperm kinematic parameters for sperm subpopulations of top and bottom layers after swim-up. Telomeric index for linearity, VSL, VCL, STR, BCF, and ALH were significantly more in the TL-sperm group than the BL-sperm group (P < 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Telomeric index of sperm kinematic parameters [log (parameter × telomere length)]. VCL, curvilinear velocity; VSL, straight line velocity; ALH, lateral head displacement; STR, straightness of trajectory, LIN, linearity; BCF, beat cross frequency. Data are given as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *Significant difference (P < 0.05) between sperm subpopulations of top (green diamond) and bottom (red brick) layers after swim-up

Full size image

Relative expression of shelterin genes

Figure 3. indicates the relative expression of shelterin genes in the TL- and BL-sperm subpopulations obtained after swim-up. The relative expression of the RAP1 gene was significantly more in the TL-sperm group than the BL-sperm group, while the relative expression of POT1, TIN2, and TRF2 genes was significantly less in the TL-sperm group than the BL-sperm group (P < 0.05). The gene expression of TPP1 and TRF1 did not change between the two groups of sperm subpopulations.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of relative expression of shelterin genes between sperm subpopulations of top (green diamond) and bottom (red brick) layers after swim-up. Data are given as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). * Significant difference between two groups (P < 0.05)

Full size image

Discussion

Motility is a complex physiological property of spermatozoa, which is controlled by several extrinsic and intrinsic factors during spermatogenesis and sperm transit from seminiferous tubules to the fertilization site (oviduct). Any alteration of these factors leads to various severity of stress and disruption in the normal motility development in sperm. The external and internal stressors play a critical role in the induction of oxidative stress, chromosome mutations, immunogenetic disorders, and apoptosis. They affect the activity of enzymatic and non-enzymatic responses that lead to a downgrading in sperm motion quality [15]. Because of susceptibility of the sperm nuclear chromatin concentration period to oxidants and lack of the DNA repair mechanism in the sperm cells, chromosomal damages are expectable during spermatogenesis and sperm maturation. Damages such as base modifications, frameshifts, deletions, cross-linking, DNA strand breaks, rearrangement of chromosomes, and telomere shortening have been reported [16, 17]. In this study, there was a considerably longer telomere size in the high motile sperm subpopulation separated by swim-up method. In this regard, Santiso et al. [18] reported that following swim-up of human semen, the sperm subpopulation of the top layer has a longer telomere length and lower DNA fragmentation. Our finding is also in agreement with other studies suggesting the assessment of sperm telomere length as an index for chromatin integrity and infertility [19, 20].

In this study, the relative expression of six shelterin genes (i.e., TRF1, TRF2, RAP1, POT1, TIN2, and TPP1) was evaluated in the sperm subpopulations with good (longer telomere) and poor (shorter telomere) motion qualities, but only four of those considerably changed. TRF2, POT1, and TIN2 were increased, and RAP1 decreased in the subpopulation with poor motion quality (shorter telomere).

TRF2 is the core component of shelterin which plays a prominent role in telomere stability and maintenance of normal cell physiology. TRF2 folds telomeres into loops to inhibit undue DNA damage response, avoids the ataxia telangiectasiamutated kinase signaling and telomere nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), and promotes telomere replication. It has been confirmed that TRF2 protein mutation or abnormal expression leads to T‑loop destruction, loss of DNA end protection, end‑to‑end fusion, chromosomal inconstancy, cell aging, apoptosis, or anomalous transformation [21]. Many previous studies evaluated the interaction of TRF2 overexpression and its function in mammalian cells. Smogorzewska et al. [22], Richter et al. [23] and Nera et al. [24] indicated that following the induction of high levels of TRF2 in cell lines, progressive shortening of telomere length resulted. On the other hand, Matsutani et al. [25] suggested that gastric carcinoma tissue with short telomere and chromosomal instability overexpresses the TRF2 to create the structure of D-loop and T-loop and protect the telomere ends. Muñoz et al. [26] and Benetti et al. [27] also showed that the telomere was degraded in TRF2-overexpressed mouse models and XPF nuclease over-activity led to this degradation, causing premature aging and increased cancer. The mentioned studies confirm our data that there is an association between the telomere shortening and TRF2 overexpression, although comparing the function of sperm and cancer cells may not be a sensible approach, and more detailed studies on sperm are needed for confirmation.

TIN2, as an adaptor protein plays a linking role in the shelterin complex. This protein participates in the regulation of DNA damage response. Its mutations are associated with telomeric DNA impairment, telomere instability related to telomerase activity, and premature aging [28]. Chen et al. [29] found that TIN2 is a regulator of metabolism that controls mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Hu et al. [30] determined that the overexpression of TIN2 and TRF2 proteins counteract the effects of the TERT protein in gastric cancer tissue and leads to further telomere shortening. This data is consistent with our finding of TIN2 in spermatozoa with shorter telomeres, but further study on sperm is required to validate this result, as mentioned, it does not seem reasonable to compare the function of sperm and cancer cells. It is perhaps that overexpression of TIN2 in association with TRF2 is a vital factor in the telomere shortening of low motile spermatozoa. On the other hand, a high level of TIN2 may affect sperm metabolism by disrupting the function of mitochondria; of course, new research is necessary to confirm the latter issue.

POT1, as a critical component of the shelterin complex, regulates telomere length and telomere capping. This protein protects the chromosome ends from recombination, chromosome instability, and abnormal segregation [31]. It has been demonstrated that POT1 represses the efficiency of NHEJ, repairs DNA double-strand breaks, and progresses NHEJ fidelity [32]. D Gomez, et al. [33] reported that POT1 overexpression in cell lines improves both telomere and G-overhang length. It should be noticed that the mentioned studies evaluated POT1 at the level of cell translation while our results were at the level of POT1 transcription that is earlier to the translation. Therefore, in the spermatozoa with shorter telomere, the increase of POT1 transcript may be the evidence of a compensatory effect to produce more POT1 protein for improving the telomere. However, further study is needed to evaluate factors involving POT1 translation and to measure the level of POT1 protein in these cells.

RAP1 is another component of the shelterin complex that protects the telomere ends using the activation of different DNA repair mechanisms. It has several roles in controlling the gene expression, specific signaling pathways (e.g., NF-κB pathway), and metabolism [28]. It has been revealed that overexpression [34] or depletion of the RAP1 [35] may cause telomere shortening, leading to cell aging. However, the here observed association of lower RAP1 in low motile spermatozoa with shorter telomeres, may be in agreement with many previous studies [34, 35].

In addition to the direct effects of shelterin proteins in regulating the telomere length, they also act indirectly via controlling the telomerase activity [28]. It is possible that alterations of shelterin components like TRF2, TIN2, POT1, and RAP1 as observed in this study, change the telomere length via effect in the activation of telomerase enzyme.

Conclusions

we provided evidence that there are considerable changes in gene expression of many shelterin components (TRF2, TIN2, POT1 and RAP1) associated with telomere shortening in the spermatozoa with poor motion quality. Possibly, a decrease in kinematic characteristics could be the result of defects in the shelterin complex and telomere length.

Methods

All used chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (Louis, MO).

Animals, collection and swim-up of ejaculated sperm, and CASA analysis

Semen samples of good quality were collected from ten male crossbred dogs (2–4 years old). Dogs were cared at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad) and housed in pens with ample runs. They were fed well twice a day and were given access to water ad libitum. The project underwent ethical review and was approved by the local Ethics Committee of Shahrekord University and Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR.SKU.REC.1400.076). Before semen collection, a complete breeding soundness examination was performed consisting of a history, physical examination (general and andrological), semen evaluation, and testing for Brucella canis. In clinical andrological examination, the genital organs were checked by palpation or sonography [36]. An expert operator collected the ejaculated semen (sperm-rich fraction) from each dog using a funnel collecting vial and manual massage of the penis, and then immediately transported it to the laboratory. All semen samples had a volume of about 0.8-3 ml (sperm-rich fraction), and color of pearly white or translucent. Sperm morphology was evaluated by microscopic analysis (1000×) of a slide stained with eosin-nigrosin. All semen samples expressed a minimum of 70% normal sperm morphology. Semen samples were initially evaluated by computer-assisted sperm analysis (HFT CASA, Hoshmand Fanavar Tehran, Iran). Semen samples had a concentration of about 100–200 × 106 spermatozoa/ml. Only samples that had progressive motility more than 60% were used in this study. Equal volumes of semen and a primary sperm diluent without antibiotic (consisting of 69.4 mM fructose, 249.8 mM Tris, and 80.9 mM citric acid) [37] were mixed, then centrifuged at 700 x g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet containing sperm was resuspended in 100 μl diluent. For swim-up, this sperm sample (100 μl) was gently over-layered with pre-warmed 2 ml diluent in a conical tube which was sealed, inclined at 45 degrees and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After this time, sterile Pasteur pipettes were used to gently collect 100 μl of the diluent containing sperm from each top (from its upper part) and bottom layer to new microtubes. CASA analysis was repeated for separated sperm samples from the top layer (as TL-sperm) and bottom layer (as BL-sperm). Finally, these sperm samples were stored at -70 °C until subsequent DNA and RNA extractions.

CASA system was set according to [38], and then analysis was done using Mackler chambers (20 μm depth). In this system, the following kinematic parameters were measured: total motility (%), progressive motility (%) and non-motility (%), straight-line velocity (VSL, μm/s) is the average velocity measured in a straight line from the beginning to the end of one track; the curvilinear velocity (VCL, μm/s) is the average velocity measured over the actual point to point track followed by the cell, the amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH, μm), is the degree of lateral displacement of the sperm head’s centroid around its average path; the beat cross frequency (BCF, Hz), is the frequency at which the sperm cell’s head crosses the sperm cell’s average pathway; the linearity (LIN, %) is the linearity of a curvilinear path; the straightness (STR, %) is the proximity of the cell’s pathway to a straight line [38].

Genomic DNA extraction and telomere size analysis by quantitative real-time PCR

Genomic DNA was extracted directly from sperm cells (samples of TL-sperm and BL-sperm) using a High yield DNA Purification Kit (DNP™ Kit, SinaClon BioScience, Karaj, Iran) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

To measure the relative telomere length of sperm, relative quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed using a SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNaseH Plus) kit (Takara Bio Inc., Japan). The telomere primers used were Tel1 (5′-GGTTTTTGAGGGTGAGGGTGAGGGTGAGGGTGAGGGT-3′) and Tel 2 (5′-TCCCGACTATCCCTATCCCTATCCCTATCCCTATCCCTA-3′) [39]. The 18 S ribosomal RNA (18 S) gene (167 bp amplicon) was chosen as the reference gene [40]. The primer sequences used were 18 S-F (5′- GGCATTCGTATTGCGCCG-3′) and 18 S-R (5′-ATCGCCAGTCGGCATCGT-3′). The melt curves of both telomere and 18 S following amplification showed a single peak (Fig. 4), evidence of specific amplification. The amplification was done in a final volume of 10 μl for both telomere and 18 S. A volume of 9 ng was used in each reaction. The concentration of each primer was 250 nM. Amplifications were performed in triplicate for each sample in a Rotor-Gene 6000 thermocycler (Qiagen, Australia). The PCR program for telomere was 95 °C for 10 min and 20 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 54 °C for 2 min. The PCR program for 18 S was 95 °C for 10 min and 35 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 20 s and 72 °C for 20 s. A no-template control reaction was run to ensure no contamination. The threshold cycle number (Ct) of PCR and mean efficiency values (E) for telomere (T) and 18 S (S) were determined using LinRegPCR software (2012.0, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Relative telomere length (T/S ratio) was calculated according to Pfaffl [41] and Näslund et al. [42]. In this method, the level of telomere length relative to 18 S was counted for each sample using the following formula:

$${\rm{E}}{\,_{{\rm{18S}}}}{\,^{{\rm{(Ct}}\,{\rm{sample)}}}}\,{\rm{/}}\,{\rm{E}}{\,_{{\rm{telomere}}}}{\,^{{\rm{(Ct}}\,{\rm{sample)}}}}.$$
Fig. 4
figure 4

Specificity of real time PCR amplification. Melting curves (dissociation curves) of the 7 target genes and 2 reference genes (β-actin and 18 S) amplicons after the real time PCR reactions, all showing one peak. X-axis (horizontal): temperature (C); Y-axis (vertical): negative derivative of fluorescence over temperature (dF/dT)

Full size image

In this study, to involve telomere length value in comparing sperm kinematic parameters between two experimental groups, an index was designed as a log (kinematic parameter × telomere length).

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and mRNAs assay by RT-qPCR

Total RNA of sperm cells was extracted with RNX-Plus solution (Sinaclon Bioscience, Karaj, Iran) and the acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform single-step method according to Bahadoran et al. [43] and Kadivar et al. [44]. The obtained RNA pellet was resuspended in 20 μl DEPC-treated water and then treated with RNAase-free DNAase (SinaClon) to clean contaminating genomic DNA. The quality and integrity of RNA samples were evaluated by spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis. Only RNA samples representing an A260/A280 ratio of 1.8–2.2 were suitable for cDNA synthesis. The synthesis of cDNA was done using PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit (Takara) according to its manufacturer’s instructions. The yielding cDNA was stored at − 20 °C until RT-qPCR [45].

To determine the possible changes in the transcriptional levels of shelterin genes (TRF1, TRF2, RAP1, POT1, TIN2, and TPP1) in two groups of TL- and BL-sperm samples, relative RT-qPCR was performed using PCR kit as mentioned above. To normalize the input load of cDNA and to quantify the relative target gene expression, β-actin was used as a stable control gene [46]. The used specific primers of genes are represented in Table 2. The PCR for each sample was performed in three replicates. 10 ng cDNA and 400 nM of each specific primer were used in a total volume of 10 μl. The program of PCR amplification was as 94 °C for 10 min, then 40–45 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 58–62 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. No-template and no-reverse transcriptase controls were used in each PCR reaction. Data of the threshold cycle numbers and mean efficiency values were recorded and calculated using LinRegPCR software. Then relative gene expression (target / β-actin) was calculated according to the Pfaffl method [41, 47].

Table 2 Primer used for quantitative real time PCR analysis of canine mRNAs
Full size table

Statistical analysis

Data are given as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). To check the normality of data, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was performed. Differences between mean values of the two TL- and BL-sperm groups were analyzed using the independent Student’s t-test in SPSS 26.0 software (IBM-SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Memon M. Common causes of male dog infertility. Theriogenology. 2007;68(3):322–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Turner RM. Moving to the beat: a review of mammalian sperm motility regulation. Reprod Fertility Dev. 2005;18(2):25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbagallo F, La Vignera S, Cannarella R, Aversa A, Calogero AE, Condorelli RA. Evaluation of sperm mitochondrial function: a key organelle for sperm motility. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Durairajanayagam D, Singh D, Agarwal A, Henkel R. Causes and consequences of sperm mitochondrial dysfunction. Andrologia. 2021;53(1):e13666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang W-L, Tu C-F, Tan Y-Q. Insight on multiple morphological abnormalities of sperm flagella in male infertility: what is new? Asian J Androl. 2020;22(3):236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Simon L, Lewis SE. Sperm DNA damage or Progressive motility: which one is the better predictor of fertilization in vitro? Syst Biology Reproductive Med. 2011;57(3):133–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drevet JR, Aitken RJ. Oxidation of sperm nucleus in mammals: a physiological necessity to some extent with adverse impacts on oocyte and offspring. Antioxidants. 2020;9(2):95–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith EM, Pendlebury DF, Nandakumar J. Structural biology of telomeres and telomerase. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(1):61–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reig-Viader R, Garcia-Caldés M, Ruiz-Herrera A. Telomere homeostasis in mammalian germ cells: a review. Chromosoma. 2016;125(2):337–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalmbach KH, Antunes DMF, Dracxler RC, Knier TW, Seth-Smith ML, Wang F, Liu L, Keefe DL. Telomeres and human reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):23–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nasiri L, Vaez-Mahdavi M-R, Hassanpour H, Ardestani SK, Askari N. Sulfur mustard and biological ageing: a multisystem biological health score approach as an extension of the allostatic load in Sardasht chemical veterans. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;101:108375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grill S, Nandakumar J. Molecular mechanisms of telomere biology disorders. J Biol Chem. 2021;296:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Lange T. Shelterin-mediated telomere protection. Annu Rev Genet. 2018;52:223–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hug N, Lingner J. Telomere length homeostasis. Chromosoma. 2006;115(6):413–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kamiński P, Baszyński J, Jerzak I, Kavanagh BP, Nowacka-Chiari E, Polanin M, Szymański M, Woźniak A, Kozera W. External and genetic conditions determining male infertility. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(15):5274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Qiu Y, Yang H, Li C, Xu C. Progress in research on sperm DNA fragmentation. Med Sci Monitor: Int Med J Experimental Clin Res. 2020;26:e918746–918741.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Darmishonnejad Z, Zarei-Kheirabadi F, Tavalaee M, Zarei‐Kheirabadi M, Zohrabi D, Nasr‐Esfahani MH. Relationship between sperm telomere length and sperm quality in infertile men. Andrologia. 2020;52(5):e13546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Santiso R, Tamayo M, Gosálvez J, Meseguer M, Garrido N, Fernández JL. Swim-up procedure selects spermatozoa with longer telomere length. Mutat Research/Fundamental Mol Mech Mutagen. 2010;688(1–2):88–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cariati F, Jaroudi S, Alfarawati S, Raberi A, Alviggi C, Pivonello R, Wells D. Investigation of sperm telomere length as a potential marker of paternal genome integrity and semen quality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;33(3):404–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rocca M, Speltra E, Menegazzo M, Garolla A, Foresta C, Ferlin A. Sperm telomere length as a parameter of sperm quality in normozoospermic men. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(6):1158–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z, Wu X. Abnormal function of telomere protein TRF2 induces cell mutation and the effects of environmental Tumor–promoting factors. Oncol Rep. 2021;46(2):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smogorzewska A, van Steensel B, Bianchi A, Oelmann S, Schaefer MR, Schnapp G, de Lange T. Control of human telomere length by TRF1 and TRF2. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(5):1659–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Richter T, Saretzki G, Nelson G, Melcher M, Olijslagers S, von Zglinicki T. TRF2 overexpression diminishes repair of telomeric single-strand breaks and accelerates telomere shortening in human fibroblasts. Mech Ageing Dev. 2007;128(4):340–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nera B, Huang H-S, Lai T, Xu L. Elevated levels of TRF2 induce telomeric ultrafine anaphase bridges and rapid telomere deletions. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsutani N, Yokozaki H, Tahara E, Tahara H, Kuniyasu H, Haruma K, Chayama K, Yasui W, Tahara E. Expression of telomeric repeat binding factor 1 and 2 and TRF1-interacting nuclear protein 2 in human gastric carcinomas. Int J Oncol. 2001;19(3):507–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Muñoz P, Blanco R, Blasco MA. Role of the TRF2 telomeric protein in cancer and aging. Cell Cycle. 2006;5(7):718–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Benetti R, Schoeftner S, Muñoz P, Blasco MA. Role of TRF2 in the assembly of telomeric chromatin. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(21):3461–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mir SM, Tehrani SS, Goodarzi G, Jamalpoor Z, Asadi J, Khelghati N, Qujeq D, Maniati M. Shelterin complex at telomeres: implications in ageing. Clin Interv Aging. 2020;15:827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen L-Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Li H, Luo Z, Fang H, Kim SH, Qin L, Yotnda P, Xu J. Mitochondrial localization of telomeric protein TIN2 links telomere regulation to metabolic control. Mol Cell. 2012;47(6):839–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu H, Zhang Y, Zou M, Yang S, Liang X-Q. Expression of TRF1, TRF2, TIN2, TERT, KU70, and BRCA1 proteins is associated with telomere shortening and may contribute to multistage carcinogenesis of gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136(9):1407–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Baumann P, Price C. Pot1 and telomere maintenance. FEBS Lett. 2010;584(17):3779–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Yu Y, Tan R, Ren Q, Gao B, Sheng Z, Zhang J, Zheng X, Jiang Y, Lan L, Mao Z. POT1 inhibits the efficiency but promotes the fidelity of nonhomologous end joining at non-telomeric DNA regions. Aging. 2017;9(12):2529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Gomez D, Wenner T, Brassart B, Douarre C, O’Donohue M-F, El Khoury V, Shin-Ya K, Morjani H, Trentesaux C, Riou J-F. Telomestatin-induced telomere uncapping is modulated by POT1 through G-overhang extension in HT1080 human Tumor cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(50):38721–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. O’Connor MS, Safari A, Liu D, Qin J, Songyang Z. The human Rap1 protein complex and modulation of telomere length. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(27):28585–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Martinez P, Thanasoula M, Carlos AR, Gómez-López G, Tejera AM, Schoeftner S, Dominguez O, Pisano DG, Tarsounas M, Blasco MA. Mammalian Rap1 controls telomere function and gene expression through binding to telomeric and extratelomeric sites. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(8):768–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Arlt SP, Reichler IM, Herbel J, Schäfer-Somi S, Riege L, Leber J, Frehner B. Diagnostic tests in canine andrology-what do they really tell us about fertility? Theriogenology. 2023;196:150–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bencharif D, Amirat-Briand L, Garand A, Anton M, Schmitt E, Desherces S, Delhomme G, Langlois M-L, Barrière P, Destrumelle S. Freezing canine sperm: comparison of semen extenders containing Equex® and LDL (low density lipoproteins). Anim Reprod Sci. 2010;119(3–4):305–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahmadi E, Tahmasebian-Ghahfarokhi N, Nafar-Sefiddashti M, Sadeghi-Sefiddashti M, Hassanpour H. Impacts of in vitro thermal stress on ovine epididymal spermatozoa and the protective effect of β-mercaptoethanol as an antioxidant. Veterinary Res Forum. 2020;11(1):43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cawthon RM. Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(10):e47–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Dutra L, Souza F, Friberg I, Araújo M, Vasconcellos A, Young R. Validating the use of oral swabs for telomere length assessment in dogs. J Veterinary Behav. 2020;40:16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(9):e45–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Näslund J, Pauliny A, Blomqvist D, Johnsson JI. Telomere dynamics in wild brown trout: effects of compensatory growth and early growth investment. Oecologia. 2015;177(4):1221–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bahadoran S, Hassanpour H, Arab S, Abbasnia S, Kiani A. Changes in the expression of cardiac genes responsive to thyroid hormones in the chickens with cold-induced pulmonary Hypertension. Poult Sci. 2021;100(8):101263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kadivar A, Khoei HH, Hassanpour H, Ghanaei H, Golestanfar A, Mehraban H, Davoodian N, Tafti RD. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARα, PPARγ and PPARβ/δ) gene expression profile on ram spermatozoa and their relation to the sperm motility. Veterinary Res Forum. 2016;7(1):27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hassanpour H, Nikoukar Z, Nasiri L, Bahadoran S. Differential gene expression of three nitric oxide synthases is consistent with increased nitric oxide in the hindbrain of broilers with cold-induced pulmonary Hypertension. Br Poult Sci. 2015;56(4):436–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Abdillah DA, Setyawan EM, Oh HJ, Ra K, Lee SH, Kim MJ, Lee BC. Iodixanol supplementation during sperm cryopreservation improves protamine level and reduces reactive oxygen species of canine sperm. J Vet Sci. 2019;20(1):79–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Pirany N, Bakrani Balani A, Hassanpour H, Mehraban H. Differential expression of genes implicated in liver lipid metabolism in broiler chickens differing in weight. Br Poult Sci. 2020;61(1):10–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Du Sert NP, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, Clark A, Cuthill IC, Dirnagl U, Emerson M. Reporting animal research: explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(7):e3000411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Vice Chancellor for Research of Shahrekord University.

Funding

This research was supported by the funds granted for a student thesis via Vice Chancellor for Research of Shahrekord University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gametes and Cloning, Research Institute of Animal Embryo Technology, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

    Hossein Hassanpour, Marzieh Salehpour, Khadije Amiri & Parvin Ghareghani

  2. Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Pezhman Mirshokraei

  3. Department of Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

    Leila Nasiri

Authors
  1. Hossein Hassanpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pezhman Mirshokraei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marzieh Salehpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Khadije Amiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Parvin Ghareghani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Leila Nasiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.H. was the supervisor, designed the study and analyzed data. P.M. contributed to collecting the samples. M.S., K.A. and P.G. carried out the experiments and assembled data. H.H. and L.N. contributed to writing, reviewing and editing the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Hassanpour.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project underwent ethical review and was approved by the local Ethics Committee of Shahrekord University (IR.SKU.REC.1400.076). The care and use of experimental animals complied with local animal welfare laws, guidelines and policies. The study was also carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines [48].

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassanpour, H., Mirshokraei, P., Salehpour, M. et al. Canine sperm motility is associated with telomere shortening and changes in expression of shelterin genes. BMC Vet Res 19, 236 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12917-023-03795-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12917-023-03795-x

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us