Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

G1-like M and PB2 genes are preferentially incorporated into H7N9 progeny virions during genetic reassortment

BMC Veterinary Research volume 17, Article number: 80 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Genotype S H9N2 viruses have become predominant in poultry in China since 2010. These viruses frequently donate their whole internal gene segments to other emerging influenza A subtypes such as the novel H7N9, H5N6, and H10N8 viruses. We recently reported that the PB2 and M genes of the genotype S H9N2 virus, which are derived from the G1-like virus, enhance the fitness of H5Nx and H7N9 avian influenza viruses in chickens and mice. However, whether the G1-like PB2 and M genes are preferentially incorporated into progeny virions during virus reassortment remains unclear; whether the G1-like PB2 and M genes from different subtypes are differentially incorporated into new virion progeny remains unknown.

Results

We conducted a reassortment experiment with the use of a H7N9 virus as the backbone and found that G1-like M/PB2 genes were preferentially incorporated in progeny virions over F/98-like M/PB2 genes. Importantly, the preference varied among G1-like M/PB2 genes of different subtypes. When competing with F/98-like M/PB2 genes during reassortment, both the M and PB2 genes from the H7N9 virus GD15 showed an advantage, whereas only the PB2 gene from the H9N2 virus CZ73 and the M gene from the H9N2 virus AH320 displayed the advantage.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the preferential and variable advantages of H9N2-derived G1-like M and PB2 genes in incorporating them into H7N9 progeny virions over SH14-derived F/98-like M/PB2 genes.

Background

Widespread reassortment of H9N2 viruses in China has created various subtypes that can be phylogenetically grouped into the A-W genotypes [1]. More than one genotype may circulate simultaneously in one region. Some genotypes became dominant over a long period of time [2]. For instance, H9N2 viruses that harbour three polymerase genes and the NP gene from the F/98-like virus plus the remaining four genes from the BJ/94-like virus form a group of viruses designated as F/98-like or H genotype (Fig. 1) [2]. F/98-like (genotype H) viruses were first identified in 1998, became dominant in 2000, and persisted for several years thereafter [2, 3]. Since 2007, the genotype S viruses, which were generated through the reassortment of the F/98-like viruses (genotype H) by substituting their M and PB2 genes with those of the G1-like virus, have emerged (Fig. 1) and gradually dominated in chicken flocks after 2010 [2,3,4,5]. Moreover, genotype S H9N2 viruses often donate some or all the six internal genes to other emerging influenza A viruses in China [2, 6] such as the novel H7N9, H10N8, H7N7, and H5N6 viruses [2, 7,8,9]. That is, the H9N2 and H7N9 viruses currently circulating in China both possess G1-like M and PB2 genes [10].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the genetic constellations of the different viruses. SH14 virus were genotype H H9N2 virus; CZ73 and AH320 viruses were genotype S H9N2 viruses; and GD15 were H7N9 virus whose internal genes all came from genotype S H9N2 viruses

Full size image

The S genotype, which differs from F/98-like viruses (genotype H) only in their M and PB2 genes [11, 12], has not been replaced by a new genotype since 2010 [2]. As S genotype viruses carry the genetic backbone of F/98-like viruses (genotype H) plus the M and PB2 genes of the G1-like viruses, it is presumed that the G1-like M and PB2 genes confer better viral fitness over F/98-like counterparts.

Indeed, Pu et al. reported that H9N2 viruses with the G1-like M gene replicate faster in primary chicken embryonic fibroblasts and chickens than do the H genotype viruses. Furthermore, the H9N2 virus with the G1-like M gene exhibit an early surge of viral mRNA and genomic RNA production, suggesting of increased fitness of the virus [13]. Consistently, Hao et al. found that H5Nx and H7N9 viruses harbouring the G1-like PB2 and M genes display better viral fitness than those with F/98-like PB2 or M genes and have high virulence and replication capacity in chickens and mice [11, 12].

Our present study aims to determine if G1-like M and PB2 genes hold a competitive advantage during genetic reassortment, whether they play a role in maintaining the stability of “gene cassette” in H7N9 viruses. Several representative H7N9 and H9N2 viruses were chosen to test the relative copy number of G1-like M/PB2 genes and F/98-like M/PB2 genes in reassortant viruses on the H7N9 genetic background. The TaqMan-MGB quantitative realtime PCR (qRT-PCR) approaches for accurately quantifying the heteroplasmy level of G1-like M/PB2 and F/98-like M/PB2 were introduced in our study. The MGB probes had higer melting temperature. Therefore, they are much shorter than the traditional TaqMan probes, which makes MGB probes more sensitive to single base mismatches [14, 15]. Multiple studies have demonstrated that TaqMan-MGB qRT-PCR is an accurate technique with high specificity, sensitivity and remarkable reproducibility and is quite attractive for use in SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) detection and allelic discrimination [16, 17].

Our results suggests that the G1-like M and PB2 genes are more likely to be incorporated into the novel H7N9 viruses than that of SH14 virus derived F/98-like M/PB2 genes; G1-like PB2/M genes derived from different virus strains display variable competitive advantages during virus reassortment.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of duplex real-time RT-qPCR assay

We first evaluated the sensitivity of duplex RT-qPCR by using ten-fold serially diluted plasmid mixtures as the templates in the amplification reaction. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S1A & B and Fig. S2A & B, each gene could be readily amplified with approximately 10 copies of templates when crossing point was less than 35(cp < 35). The standard curves revealed excellent correlation coefficient and amplification efficacy (Fig. S1 C-F, Fig. S 2 C-F and Fig. S 3 A-D) when cp < 35. Moreover, there was no significant difference in amplification efficiency among the probes. To determine the specificity of duplex RT-qPCR used in this study, the G1-like M/PB2 plasmids from GD15, CZ73, AH320 viruses and the F/98-like M/PB2 plasmids from genotype H H9N2 SH14 virus were used as templates for the amplification reactions. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S4, the M/PB2 genes from GD15, CZ73 and AH320 could not be detected with SH14-Mprobe974 or SH14-PB2probe713; whereas M/PB2 genes of SH14 virus could not be detected by using GD15-Mprobe974, Mprobe975–17, GD15-PB2probe713 or PB2probe974RC.

G1-like M and PB2 genes from GD15 (H7N9) virus hold a competitive advantage during reassortment

To determine whether the G1-like M segment was preferentially incorporated into reassorted virus progeny when it was in competition with F/98-like M gene, 293 T cells were co-transfected with eight plasmids of the GD15 virus plus the ninth one encoding f98SH14-M gene (500 ng /plasmid) (Fig. 2a) [18]. After incubation for 72 h, the conditioned media of transfected cells, which contained the reassorted progeny virions, were used to inoculate into embryonated chicken eggs. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of allantoic fluids revealed that the copy number of the g1GD15-M gene was significantly greater than that of the f98SH14-M gene (Fig. 2b). However, when just 250 ng of the g1GD15-M plasmid was repeated for the above mentioned 9-plasmid transfection, approximate level of gene copies was displayed between g1GD15-M and f98SH14-M (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Competitive between g1GD15-M/PB2 and f98SH14-M/PB2 genes during cotransfection. (A & D) Schematic representation of the plasmids, and different amount of M and PB2 plasmids were used in the cotransfections. (B&C) Quantitative analysis of g1GD15-M and f98SH14-M genes in virus population expanded from the contransfection. 293 T cells were cotransfected with nine plasmids, supernatants were collected and inoculated into eggs. qRT-PCR was performed to determine the numbers of g1GD15-M and f98SH14-M genes. (E & F) Quantitative analysis of g1GD15-PB2 and f98SH14-PB2 genes in virus population expanded from the contransfection. 293 T cells were cotransfected with nine plasmids, 500 ng (E) and 250 ng (F) of g1GD15-PB2 plasmid was used respectively. Supernatants were collected and inoculated into eggs. qRT-PCR was performed to determine the numbers of g1GD15-M and f98SH14-M genes in allantoic fluid. Data are represented as mean ± SD (N = 8). The statistically significant differences were analyzed by ANOVA (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)

Full size image

We next determined whether the G1-like PB2 gene also exhibited competitive advantage during genetic reassortment. Co-transfection experiments with the nine-plasmid system were similarly carried out as above. As shown in Fig. 2d, the copy number of the g1GD15-PB2 gene was significantly higher than that of the f98SH14-PB2 gene in the viruses rescued from the cells transfected with 500 (Fig. 2e) or 250 ng (Fig. 2f) plasmid each. The competitive advantage of the G1-like PB2 gene from GD15 virus was more prominent than that of the G1-like M gene.

Variable advantage of G1-like M/PB2 genes from different strains during reassortment

We next investigated if the competitive advantage of the M and PB2 genes from G1-like viruses in reassortment was strain-specific. The G1-like M and PB2 genes from two additional S genotype H9N2 viruses, A/Chicken/Jiangsu/CZ73/2014 (CZ73) and A/Chicken/Anhui/AH320/2016 (AH320), were used in co-transfection experiments as described above. As shown in Fig. 3a, b, the copy number of the g1CZ73-PB2 gene was significantly higher than that of the f98SH14-PB2 gene in the rescued viruses (Fig. 3c). However, there was no significant difference in the copy number of the M gene in reassortant viruses rescued from co-transfection with the g1CZ73-M and f98SH14-M genes (Fig. 3d). We then investigated the effect of the internal gene cassette of the CZ73 virus on virus reassortment. Co-transfections with six plasmids encoding the internal genes of CZ73 virus plus the plasmid encoding the f98SH14-PB2 or f98SH14-M (500 ng/plasmid) (Fig. 3e, f) revealed that the copy number of g1CZ73-PB2 genes was significantly higher than that of f98SH14-PB2 gene (Fig. 3g), although g1CZ73-M genes did not exhibit any competitive advantages (Fig. 3h).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic representation of the system used to perform cotransfection and coinfection. (A & B) Competitive between g1CZ73-M/PB2 and f98SH14-M/PB2 in backgroud of GD15 with PB2 and M from CZ73 and M/PB2 from SH14 during cotransfection. (E & F) Competitive between g1CZ73-M/PB2 and f98SH14-M/PB2 during cotransfection, where the internal genes of GD15 were replaced by those of CZ73. (I & K) Competitive between g1AH320-M/PB2 and f98SH14-M/PB2 in backgroud of GD15 with PB2 and M from AH320 and M/PB2 from SH14 during cotransfection. 500 ng of each plasmid was used in above cotransfections. (C & D & G & H & J & L) Quantitative analysis of PB2 and M genes in allantoic fluid. Data are represented as mean ± SD (N = 6). The statistically significant differences were analyzed by ANOVA (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)

Full size image

We then conducted a similar co-transfection experiment by using the M or PB2 gene of another S genotype H9N2 virus, AH320 (Fig. 3i, k). qPCR analysis revealed that the copy number of the g1AH320-M gene in the rescued viruses was significantly higher than that of the f98SH14-M gene (Fig. 3j). The copy number of the g1AH320-PB2 gene in rescued viruses was higher than that of the f98SH14-PB2 gene. However, this was not statistically significant (Fig. 3l).

Lack of competitive advantage for the g1GD15-M gene incorporation into the H7N9 background over f98SH14-M gene during co-infection

We next determined if the competitive advantage of G1-like M and PB2 genes during reassortment was in part due to faster replication of newly reassorted viruses. We generated four recombinant viruses (WT-GD15, GD15-MSH14, GD15-PB2SH14 and GD15-MSH14PB2SH14) (Fig. 4a-d). As shown in Fig. 4e, the titers of WT-GD15 virus at 48 h post infection (h.p.i) were significantly higher than three recombinant viruses, which gave similar virus titers in the conditioned media. Quantitative RT- PCR analysing the M gene revealed almost equal g1GD15-M and f98SH14-M vRNA levels at 48 hpi (Table 1). We then co-infected MDCK cells with GD15-MSH14 and WT-GD15 viruses, each with 0.01 MOI (Fig. 5a). Again, quantitative RT- PCR revealed that the levels of the g1GD15-M and f98SH14-M genes in the conditioned media were not significantly different (Fig. 5b). To further investigate whether PB2 genes affected the competitive advantage of M genes at the virus level, we analysed the portion of g1GD15-M gene in progeny virions by co-infecting MDCK cells with recombinant GD15-PB2SH14 and GD15-MSH14PB2SH14 viruses (Fig. 5c). However, the copy number of g1GD15-M genes in progeny virions did not demonstrate significantly advantage over the f98SH14-M gene (Fig. 5d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Schematic representation of reassortant viruses and their growth kinetics. (A) Reassortant virus generated from eight plasmid of GD15 virus. (B) Reassortant virus bearing the genetic backbone of GD15 virus, with the g1GD15-M gene being replaced by f98SH14-M gene. (C) Reassortant virus bearing the genetic backbone of GD15 virus, with the g1GD15-PB2 being replaced by f98SH14-PB2 gene. (D) Reassortant virus bearing the genetic backbone of GD15 virus, with g1GD15-M and g1GD15-PB2 being replaced by with f98SH14-M and f98SH14-PB2 genes. (E) The growth Kinetics of the reassortant viruses in MDCK cells. MDCK cells were infected with virus at an MOI of 0.01. At the indicated times after infection, virus titeres in the supernatant were determined. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3) from triplicate independent infections. The statistically significant differences were analyzed by ANOVA compared with WT-GD15 virus (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Competitive between g1GD15-M and f98SH14-M genes during coinfection. (A) MDCK cells were coinfected with GD15-MSH14 and WT-GD15 viruses at the MOI of 0.01 (C) MDCK cells were infected with GD15-PB2SH14 and GD15-MSH14PB2SH14 viruses at the same MOI of 0.01; (B & D) Quantitative analysis of g1GD15-M and f98SH14-M genes in supernatants of the coinfected cells by qRT-PCR. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). The statistically significant differences were analyzed by ANOVA (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)

Full size image

Preference for the g1GD15-PB2 gene incorporation into the H7N9 background over f98SH14-PB2 gene during co-infection

MDCK cells were co-infected with GD15-PB2SH14 and WT-GD15 viruses (0.01 MOI each) (Fig. 6a). qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the levels of the G1-like PB2 gene in the progeny viruses was significantly higher than that of the F/98-like PB2 gene (Fig. 6b). Given that these two viruses replicate differentially, 0.005 moi WT-GD15 virus was used in co-infection experiments. We found that at this dosage the two PB2 genes replicated at a comparable rate at 48 hpi (Table 1). Besides, another conserved gene-NP segment were detected to verify whether the changes in the levels of M and PB2 are true. The results showed that at this dosage the number of NP gene copies in progeny viruses were similar among the reassortant viruses, too (Table 1). In the coinfection experiment the number of WT-GD15 virus used was only half of that GD15-PB2SH14, the g1GD15-PB2 gene still demonstrated significant advantages (Fig. 6 C).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Competitive between g1GD15-PB2 and f98SH14-PB2 genes during coinfection. (A) Schematic representation of coinfection experiment. MDCK cells were infected with GD15-PB2SH14 at the MOI of 0.01 and WT-GD15 viruses at the MOI of 0.01 or 0.005; (D) Schematic representation of coinfection experiment. MDCK cells were infected with GD15-MSH14 and GD15-M SH14PB2SH14 viruses at the same MOI of 0.01; (B, C & E) Quantitative analysis of g1GD15-PB2 and f98SH14-PB2 genes in supernatants of the coinfected cells by qRT-PCR. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). The statistically significant differences were analyzed by ANOVA (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)

Full size image

Since genotype S H9N2 strains are generated through the replacement of the M and PB2 genes of F/98-like viruses with those from the G1-like viruses, we wondered if the M or PB2 genes would influence each other’s preference. MDCK cells were coinfected with GD15-MSH14 and GD15-MSH14PB2SH14 viruses (Fig. 6 D). The copy number of the g1GD15-PB2 gene were significantly higher than that of f98SH14-PB2 genes in the progeny viruses (Fig. 6e). However, the g1GD15-PB2 to f98SH14-PB2 ratio in this co-infection experiment was similar to that co-infected with g1GD15-PB2SH14 and WT-GD15 viruses (date not shown), suggesting that the competitive advantage of g1GD15-PB2 to f98SH14-PB2 during reassortment is not influenced by the M gene.

Discussion

If two homologous gene segments are available in a cell, they will compete with other for incorporation into progeny viruses [19]. We performed co-transfection and co-infection experiments with the M or PB2 gene derived from the G1-like and F/98-like genotypes. During reassortment, the M or PB2 gene from two genotypes would compete with other for their incorporation into progeny virions. Our co-transfection experiments showed that the copy number of g1GD15-M/ g1GD15-PB2 genes were higher in progeny virions than that of f98SH14-M/PB2 gene. These observations suggest that there is a biased genetic reassortment between G1-like M/PB2 and F/98-like M/PB2 genes. The advantage of the g1GD15-PB2 but not g1GD15-M gene in incorporating into progeny virions was conformed in our co-infection experiment. The discrepancy in the results obtained from co-transfection and co-infection experiments are likely due to the differences in the materials and methods used in the study. In addition, the interactions between viruses are more complex than plasmids. Consistent with our observations, Essere and Kawaoka reported that co-transfection and co-infection result in different reassortant genotypes [18, 20, 21]. These authors postulated that some unknown cellular factors may affect genetic reassortment [18].

The advantage of the G1-like M/PB2 genes over that of the F98-like M/PB2 genes were further investigated by using two additional genotype S H9N2 viruses, CZ73 and AH320. We found that the incorporation advantage of the G1-like M/PB2 gene was variable among strains. The findings that only the PB2 gene from the H9N2 virus CZ73 and the M gene from the H9N2 virus AH320 had an advantage suggest that the competitive advantage is not equal for the M and PB2 genes from one virus. We speculate that the internal genes of a novel H7N9 virus are not necessarily from one H9N2 virus but rather from a super recombination of genes from different H9N2 viruses.

The segmented genome of influenza viruses allows for the reassortment of gene segments between viruses when they co-infect same cells [22, 23], resulting in multiple genotypes of influenza viruses [23,24,25]. Nevertheless, the substitution of the G1-like M and PB2 genes has reduced the genetic diversity of H9N2 viruses [8, 13]; S genotype H9N2 viruses have been predominant in chickens since 2010 [2,3,4]. We speculate that the uniqueness of the internal gene cassette of the S genotype makes it possible to reach a more ideal equilibrium.

Our study has demonstrated an advantage of G1-like M and PB2 genes over F/98-like M and PB2 genes. It is not clear why the internal genes of the S genotype H9N2 virus remain stable as a cassette and has stayed prevalent in H9N2 and H7N9 viruses for many years. The genotype S H9N2 viruses provide their internal genes to various emerging viruses, especially H7N9 viruses [1, 5, 10, 13, 26]. Epidemiological evidence suggests that nearly all human and avian H7N9 isolates possess internal genes that originated from H9N2 viruses [8, 27, 28]. It is likely that the six internal genes of genotype S H9N2 viruses have reached a stable and optimal combination, ensuring the donation of the internal gene cassette to emerging viruses. On the other hand, we also observed gene segments that originated from H9N2 viruses in other viruses, such as H5N2 and H7N7 viruses but not as a whole cassette [4]. The uniqueness of internal genes of H9N2 viruses, especially those of genotype S, warrants further exploration.

Conclusions

Our study has demonstrated that G1-like PB2/M genes had competitive advantages over SH14 virus-derived F/98-like PB2/M gene during reassortment. However, their competitive advantage varied among different strains. The competitive advantage of the PB2 gene was more prominent than that of the M gene. Our results suggest that the preferential incorporation of H9N2-derived G1-like M and PB2 genes into progeny virions of H7N9 influenza viruses may help maintain the stability of the internal gene cassette in the novel H7N9 viruses.

Methods

Cells, eggs and viruses

Human embryonic kidney (293 T) cells and Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were stored by our laboratory and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin-streptomycin. The SPF embryonated chicken eggs were purchased from Beijing Merial Vital Laboratory Animal Technology Company.

The H7N9 viruses A/Chicken/Guangdong/GD15/2016 (GD15, whose internal genes are all genotype S, Fig. 1), the S genotype H9N2 viruses A/Chicken/Jiangsu/CZ73/2014 (CZ73, Fig. 1) and A/Chicken/Anhui/AH320/2016 (AH320, Fig. 1) and the H genotype H9N2 viruses A/Chicken/Shanghai/14/2001 (SH14, Fig. 1) used in this study were isolated and preserved by our laboratory.

Plasmid construct

The 8-plasmid reverse genetic systems of GD15(H7N9) virus, CZ/73(H9N2) virus and AH320(H9N2) virus were constructed in the present study, while the 8 plasmids for SH14(H9N2) viruswas constructed as previously report [29]. All constructs were verified by sequencing and preserved by our laboratory.

Nine plasmid co-transfection

Six plasmids containing PB1, PA, NP, NS, HA, and NA genes of GD15 (H7N9) virus, plus PB2/M plasmid from GD15/CZ73/AH320 virus and PB2/M plasmid from SH14 (F98-like H9N2) virus were cotransfected into 293 T and MDCK cells to examine the competition between G1-like and F/98-like PB2. The supernatants were collected after 72 h for inoculation in 9–10 day-old egg. One egg was used for each sample. 36 h post inoculation the allantoic fluid was collected and stored in − 70 °C.cotransfection experiment was run in triplicate wells and repeated at least twice for each sample.

Reverse genetics

Reassortant viruses were generated by reverse genetics as previously described [30]. Plasmids were transfected into 293 T and MDCK cells using Polyfect transfection reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 72 h, supernatants were harvested and each of the newly generated viruses was plaque purified. The purified viruses were amplified on SPF embryonated chicken eggs to generate the viral stock used in the study.

Viral growth kinetics

The growth properties of reassortant viruses were assessed as follows. Triplicate wells containing MDCK cells were infected with the indicated viruses at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01, supplemented with Opti-MEM (catalog no. 31985–070; Gibco) and incubated at 37 °C. Supernatants were collected from each well at 12, 24, 48 and 72 h post infection (h.p.i.) and were stored at − 70 °C. Viral titres were subsequently determined as the 50% tissue culture infection dose (TCID50) per 0.1 ml in MDCK cells using the method of Reed and Muench [31].

Coinfection of MDCK cells with Reassortant viruses

MDCK cells were coinfected with viruses at 0.01 or 0.005 MOIs. After incubation at 37 °C for 1 h, the virus inoculum was removed, and the cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), following by incubation at 37 °C in Opti-MEM. After 48 h, supernatants were collected from each well for subsequent analysis. Every experiment was run in triplicate wells and repeated at least twice.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR screening of gene origins

Total RNA was extracted from the allantoic fluid or cell culture supernatant using a Solarbio RNA extraction kit (Solarbio, Shanghai, China). And the extracted RNA for all samples were diluted to 100 ng/ul to guarantee equal amount of total RNA was used for the downstream RT-PCR. DNA was cleared by digesting 2 μL of vRNA with 4 μL of 4× gDNA wiper Mix (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) and 10 μL of water for 2 min at 42 °C. Next, unique 12 bp primer (5′-AGCAAAAGCAGG-3′) was used to perform reverse transcription. To identify gene origins, we designed a pair of primers (M-F948, and M-R1012) in the same sequences of f98SH14-M, g1GD15-M, g1CZ73-M and g1AH320-M, as well as three MGB probes, including SH14-Mprobe974 (against f98SH14-M), GD15-Mprobe974 (against g1GD15-M), and Mprobe975–17 (against g1CZ73-M and g1AH320-M) in the different sequences of f98SH14-M, g1GD15-M, g1CZ73-M and g1AH320-M between the two primers. Three probes were used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR to quantitatively detect gene copies of f98SH14-M, g1GD15-M, g1CZ73-M, and g1AH320-M. Likewise, we designed a pair of primers and three MGB probes, PB2-F650, PB2-R772, SH14-PB2probe713, GD15-PB2probe713 and PB2probe974RC (against g1CZ73-PB2 and g1AH320-PB2), to quantify copies of f98SH14-PB2, g1GD15-PB2, g1CZ73-PB2 and g1AH320-PB2. The specificity of each probe has been verified as early as we received the products. The sequences of the primers and probes are shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Number of copies of M/PB2 gene (log10)
Full size table
Table 2 Primers and MGB probes used in qPCR in this study and targeting genes they used to detect
Full size table

Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out in a 20 μL reaction mixtures containing 1 μL of cDNA, 250 nM each primer, 100 nM FAM probes, 100 nM VIC probe, 10 μL of 2× AceQ U+ Probe Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China), and water. The qPCR conditions were as follows: 37 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s and 40 °C for 2 min. The plasmids pHW2000-MSH14, pHW2000-MGD15, pHW2000-MCZ73, pHW2000-MAH320, pHW2000-PB2SH14, pHW2000-PB2GD15, pHW2000-PB2CZ73 and pHW2000-MAH320, were used as standards for the M/PB2 genes of SH14, GD15, CZ73 and AH320 viruses, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted by using SAS software, version 9.2 (SAS Institute).Statistically significant differences between the number of the copies of G1-like M/PB2 and F/98-like M/PB2 genes were analysed by using Duncan’s multiple range test in ANOVA. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyses during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Abbreviations

293 T cells:

Human embryonic kidney

MDCK cells:

Madin-Darby canine kidney cells

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s minimum essential medium

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

TCID50:

The 50% tissue culture infection dose

MOIs:

Multiplicity of infection

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

References

  1. Sun Y, et al. Genotypic evolution and antigenic drift of H9N2 influenza viruses in China from 1994 to 2008. Vet Microbiol. 2010;146(3–4):215–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gu M, et al. Current situation of H9N2 subtype avian influenza in China. Vet Res. 2017;48(1):49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu YF, et al. Endemic variation of H9N2 avian influenza virus in China. Avian Dis. 2016;60(4):817–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gu M, et al. Enzootic genotype S of H9N2 avian influenza viruses donates internal genes to emerging zoonotic influenza viruses in China. Vet Microbiol. 2014;174(3–4):309–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang Y, et al. Diversified reassortant H9N2 avian influenza viruses in chicken flocks in northern and eastern China. Virus Res. 2010;151(1):26–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gu M, et al. Genome sequencing and genetic analysis of a natural reassortant H5N1 subtype avian influenza virus possessing H9N2 internal genes. Bing Du Xue Bao. 2010;26(4):298–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen H, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of a fatal case of avian influenza a H10N8 virus infection: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2014;383(9918):714–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pu J, et al. Evolution of the H9N2 influenza genotype that facilitated the genesis of the novel H7N9 virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(2):548–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu C, et al. Genetic characteristics of H9N2 avian influenza viruses isolated from free-range poultry in eastern China, in 2014-2015. Poult Sci. 2018.

  10. Chang HP, et al. Avian influenza viruses (AIVs) H9N2 are in the course of reassorting into novel AIVs. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2018;19(5):409–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hao X, Hu J, Wang X, et al. The PB2 and M genes are critical for the superiority of genotype S H9N2 virus to genotype H in optimizing viral fitness of H5Nx and H7N9 avian influenza viruses in mice. Transbound Emerg Dis 2020;67:758–68.

  12. Hao X, et al. The PB2 and M genes of genotype S H9N2 virus contribute to the enhanced fitness of H5Nx and H7N9 avian influenza viruses in chickens. Virology. 2019;535:218–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pu J, et al. M Gene Reassortment in H9N2 Influenza Virus Promotes Early Infection and Replication: Contribution to Rising Virus Prevalence in Chickens in China. J Virol. 2017:91(8).

  14. Kutyavin IV, et al. 3′-minor groove binder-DNA probes increase sequence specificity at PCR extension temperatures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(2):655–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lew AE, et al. Sensitive and specific detection of bovine immunodeficiency virus and bovine syncytial virus by 5′ Taq nuclease assays with fluorescent 3′ minor groove binder-DNA probes. J Virol Methods. 2004;116(1):1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van Doorn HR, et al. Detection of a point mutation associated with high-level isoniazid resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis by using real-time PCR technology with 3′-minor groove binder-DNA probes. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(10):4630–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rong E, et al. Heteroplasmy detection of mitochondrial DNA A3243G mutation using quantitative real-time PCR assay based on TaqMan-MGB probes. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1286480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Essere B, et al. Critical role of segment-specific packaging signals in genetic reassortment of influenza a viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(40):E3840–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Inagaki A, et al. Competitive incorporation of homologous gene segments of influenza a virus into virions. J Virol. 2012;86(18):10200–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Octaviani CP, et al. High level of genetic compatibility between swine-origin H1N1 and highly pathogenic avian H5N1 influenza viruses. J Virol. 2010;84(20):10918–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Octaviani CP, Goto H, Kawaoka Y. Reassortment between seasonal H1N1 and pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza viruses is restricted by limited compatibility among polymerase subunits. J Virol. 2011;85(16):8449–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McDonald SM, et al. Reassortment in segmented RNA viruses: mechanisms and outcomes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(7):448–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tao H, et al. Influenza a virus Coinfection through transmission can support high levels of Reassortment. J Virol. 2015;89(16):8453–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun W, et al. Genetic analysis and biological characteristics of different internal gene origin H5N6 reassortment avian influenza virus in China in 2016. Vet Microbiol. 2018;219:200–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marshall N, et al. Influenza virus reassortment occurs with high frequency in the absence of segment mismatch. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(6):e1003421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu R, et al. Genetic and biological characterization of H9N2 avian influenza viruses isolated in China from 2011 to 2014. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0199260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gao R, et al. Human infection with a novel avian-origin influenza a (H7N9) virus. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(20):1888–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fan M, et al. Human influenza a(H7N9) virus infection associated with poultry farm. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(11):1902–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhong L, et al. Molecular mechanism of the airborne transmissibility of H9N2 avian influenza a viruses in chickens. J Virol. 2014;88(17):9568–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoffmann E, et al. A DNA transfection system for generation of influenza a virus from eight plasmids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(11):6108–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. REED LJ, MUENCH H. A SIMPLE METHOD OF ESTIMATING FIFTY PER CENT ENDPOINTS. Am J Epidemiol. 1938;27(3):493–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772755), the Special Financial Grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017 T100410), the Earmarked Fund For China Agriculture Research System (CARS-40), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), the Jiangsu Qinglan Project and the “High-end talent support program” of Yangzhou University. The funding bodies did not play direct roles in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Animal Infectious Disease Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China

    Xiuli Li, Min Gu, Xiaoquan Wang, Ruyi Gao, Xinxin Bu, Xiaoli Hao, Jing Ma, Jiao Hu, Shunlin Hu, Xiaowen Liu, Sujuan Chen, Daxin Peng & Xiufan Liu

  2. Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonosis, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China

    Xinan Jiao & Xiufan Liu

  3. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Zoonosis, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China

    Xinan Jiao & Xiufan Liu

  4. Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Biological Hazard Factors (Animal Origin) for Agri-food Safety and Quality, Ministry of Agriculture of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China

    Xinan Jiao & Xiufan Liu

Authors
  1. Xiuli Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Min Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoquan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ruyi Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xinxin Bu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaoli Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jing Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jiao Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shunlin Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiaowen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Sujuan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Daxin Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Xinan Jiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Xiufan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XLL and MG designed this study. XLL, RYG, XXB, XLH, and JM performed the experiments. XLL and XFL drafted the manuscript. MG, JH, SLH, XQW, XWL, SJC, DXP, XAJ, and XFL supervised all the experiments and participated in the data analysis. LXL, MG and XFL discussed and prepared the final report. All of the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiufan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No animal was involved in the experiments. All experiments involving live virulent H7N9 viruses were housed in negativepressure isolators with HEPA filters in animal biosecurity level-3 facilities in accordance with the institutional bio-safety manual.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Figure S1. Sensitivities and standard curves of the duplex TaqMan-MGB qRT-PCR targeting the M genes of SH14 and GD15 viruses. Sensitivities of SH14-Mprobe974 (A) and GD15-Mprobe974 (D) were detected by 10-fold serial dilutions of 108copies/ml f98SH14-M plasmid and g1GD15-M plasmid, respectively. The detection limit was approximately 10 copies of both gene when cp < 35. The amplification curves and the corresponding standard curve for detection of f98SH14-M (B, C) and g1GD15-M (E, F) showed excellent efficiencies of the duplex TaqMan-MGB qRT-PCR.

Additional file 2

: Figure S2. Sensitivities and standard curves of the duplex TaqMan-MGB qRT-PCR targeting the PB2 genes of SH14 and GD15 viruses. Sensitivities of SH14-PB2probe713 (A) and GD15-PB2probe713 (D) were detected by 10-fold serial dilutions of 8*108copies/ml f98SH14-PB2 plasmid and g1GD15-PB2 plasmid, respectively. The detection limit was approximately 10 copies of both gene when cp < 35. The amplification curves and the corresponding standard curve for detection of f98SH14-PB2 (B, C) and g1GD15-PB2 (E, F) showed excellent efficiencies of the duplex TaqMan-MGB qRT-PCR.

Additional file 3

: Figure S3. The amplification curves and the corresponding standard curve for detection of g1CZ73-M/g1AH320-M gene (A, B), and g1CZ73-PB2/g1AH320-PB2 (CD) gene showed excellent efficiencies of the duplex TaqMan-MGB qRT-PCR.

Additional file 4

: Figure S4. The specificity of duplex MGB TaqMan-probe-based real-time RT-qPCR. The M/PB2 genes from GD15, CZ73 and AH320 can’t be detected by SH14-Mprobe974 or SH14-PB2probe713, and M/PB2 genes from SH14 virus can’t be detected by GD15-Mprobe974, Mprobe975–17, GD15-PB2probe713 or PB2probe974RC, either.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Gu, M., Wang, X. et al. G1-like M and PB2 genes are preferentially incorporated into H7N9 progeny virions during genetic reassortment. BMC Vet Res 17, 80 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12917-021-02786-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12917-021-02786-0

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us