Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Pseudorabies virus infection in Tibetan pigs in Tibet

Contributed equally
BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201814:25

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1347-x

  • Received: 24 February 2017
  • Accepted: 15 January 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Pseudorabies (PR) is an important emerging infectious disease that is characterized by fever, extreme itching and encephalomyelitis. However, it is still unclear whether Tibetan pigs are exposed to Pseudorabies virus (PRV) or not.

The present study was conducted to investigate the seroprevalence of PRV infection in Tibetan pigs in Nyingchi area of Tibet through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A total of 368 serum samples from Tibetan pigs were collected during 2015.

Results

Results showed that 58 (15.76%) samples were found positive for PRV antibodies with further distribution of 18.23%, 13.42% and 6.25% from Nyingchi, Mainling and Gongbo’gyamda areas on the Tibetan plateau, respectively; along with 12.10%, 17.71% and 17.57% prevalence of PRV in juveniles, sub-adults and adults, respectively. The prevalence of PRV infection between male (14.61%) and female (16.84%) showed non-significant difference (P > 0.05). The risk factors of infection were found to be associated with feed type, age and altitude.

Conclusions

The present study depicts a serious concern with a new emerging infectious disease in Tibetan pigs in Tibet, China.

Keywords

  • Pseudorabies (PR)
  • Seroprevalence
  • Risk factors
  • Tibetan pigs
  • Tibet

Background

Pseudorabies (PR) or Aujeszky’s disease is one of the highly contagious diseases, which is responsible for devastating outbreaks and considerable economic losses to the swine industry in China. It is caused by Pseudorabies virus (PRV), which is the member of genus Varicellovirus, belonging to subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae, and family Herpesviridae [13]. The domestic and feral pigs are the main natural hosts of this disease [4]. The PR is usually characterized by reproductive disorders such as miscarriage, fetal death and mummified fetus. The mortality rate of newborn piglets and abortion are up to 100% in some cases [5]. The infection in growing pigs usually leads to decrease in semen quality, and even death in some cases. Pseudorabies is highly hazardous and widely distributed contagious disease, and world health organization (OIE) has listed PR as class B animal disease, and listed as the secondary kind of animal disease in China [6].

The PR is an endemic and widespread swine disease in China from the last 5 years, and it is planned as one of the priority swine diseases for control [7, 8]. Recently, with the use of PRV vaccines, this situation has been controlled on large-scale pig farms [2]; however, the prevention and control of PR on small pig farms and free-ranging pigs is still a big challenge [9]. The regional elimination and eradication program of PRV is required in China as no region is declared free from PRV yet [6].

In China, PRV was first reported in cats in 1947, and subsequently found in swine [7]. Tibetan pig is relatively ancient in origin, indigenous and rare plateau type pig breed in the world and is the only high-altitude pasture pig breed in China [10, 11]. It is distributed in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau in China (Qinghai, Sichuan, Yunnan and eastern Tibet region). The seroprevalence of PRV infection in pigs in Qinghai, Sichuan and Yunnan areas is reported in local Chinese journals but hardly accessible to international readers, and that is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Prevalence of Aujeszky’s disease virus infection in pigs and in Tibetan pig distribution province, China

Province

No. tested

Test method

Positive (%)

Reference

Qinghai

456

ELISA

4.80%

Xiaoying Qi et al. 2015 (in Chinese)

Sichuan

1110

ELISA

17.61%

Kui Nie et al. 2013 (in Chinese)

Yunnan

1164

ELISA

35.40%

Xianghua Shu et al. 2010 (in Chinese)

Tibet

368

ELISA

15.76%

In present study

To date, no survey has been conducted to elucidate PRV infection and risk factors on PR in Tibetan pigs. The current study is conducted for the first time on seroprevalence of PRV infection in Tibetan pigs and it provides a reference basis for the PRV research in the future.

Methods

The study sites

The present study was carried out in Nyingchi Prefecture in southeastern Tibet, China. This area is geographically isolated from Tibet and Sichuan Provinces by Himalayan Mountains, and shares its borders with Yunnan and Qinghai Provinces [1012]. Nepal is located on the southwest, while India and Myanmar in the south of the Nyingchi. The average elevation of the surveyed area is more than 3100 m above the sea level (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Geographic location of Aujeszky’s disease virus in four provinces, China. Map was created by using Mapinfo software; data are from the National Fundamental Geographic System website (www.dituhui.com)

Samples

A total of 368 blood samples were collected from different slaughterhouses of three counties (Nyingchi, Mainling and Gongbo’gyamda) in Tibet during 2015 (Fig. 1). All samples were collected from non-vaccinated pigs. The blood samples were collected by anterior vena cava of pigs. After collection of blood samples, each sample was centrifuged at 3000×g for 20 min to separate the serum which was subsequently stored at − 20 °C. These samples were transported in ice bag to Huazhong Agricultural University for further analysis.

The serum samples were used for detection of IgG antibodies for PRV by a commercially available ELISA kit (Wuhan Keqian Biology Co., Ltd). All the protocols were followed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the results were interpreted accordingly.

The results were based on the critical value (cut off) according to the formula: Critical Value = the average of Negative control OD630 + 0.15. The validity was ensured as: the average of Negative control OD630 - Positive control OD630 was ≥0.4. The samples were interpreted as negative: if sample OD630/ Negative controlOD630 was > 0.7 (cut off). The samples were interpreted as positive if sample OD630/ Negative control OD630 was ≤0.7 (cut off).

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed by the chi-square test using the procedure of SAS (Statistical Analysis System, Version 8.0). Statistically significant levels within factors and interactions were recognized, when probability (P) value was found P < 0.05. Odds-ratios were determined for the risk factors associated PRV along with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Seroprevalence of PRV

A total of 35 (16.36%) out of 214 serum samples were found positive for antibodies to PRV in large-scale Tibetan pig farms, with the further distribution of 23 (20.00%), 11 (12.64%) and 1 (8.33%) from Nyingchi, Mainling and Gongbo’gyamda areas, respectively. Antibodies against PRV were detected in 23 (14.94%) of 154 serum samples by ELISA in free-ranging Tibetan pigs, with the further distribution of 14 (15.91%), 9 (14.52%) and 0 from Nyingchi, Mainling and Gongbo’gyamda areas, respectively. The results were statistically significant between large-scale and free-ranging Tibetan pigs (P < 0.05), as well as among different regions (Table 2).
Table 2

Descriptive characteristics and estimates of Aujeszky’s disease virus seroprevalence at large-scale Tibetan pigs and free-range Tibetan pigs

Variable

Large-scale Tibetan pigs

Free-ranging Tibetan pigs

Total

Samples

NO. Positive (%)

Samples

NO. Positive (%)

Samples

NO. Positive (%)

Nyingchi

115

23(20.00%)

88

14(15.91%)

203

37(18.23%)

Mainling

87

11(12.64%)

62

9 (14.52%)

149

20(13.42%)

Gongbo’gyamda

12

1 (8.33%)

4

0

16

1(6.25%)

The results of this study showed that a much higher proportion of seropositive were sub-adults (17.71%), followed by adults (17.57%) and juveniles (12.10%). There was non-significant difference between the sub-adults or adults and juveniles as shown in Table 3. The results revealed that the prevalence in female and male Tibetan pigs’ was 14.61% and 16.84%, respectively. The seroprevalence was 21.43%, 15.70% and 11.11% at the altitude of 2800 m, 3200 m and 3700 m, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed that the prevalence of PRV was significantly different (P < 0.05) at different altitudes.
Table 3

Association between Tibetan pig characteristics and Aujeszky’s disease virus serological status with corresponding chi square (χ2), p-value, odds ratio (OR), and confidence interval (CI)

Characteristic

No. tested

Positive

95% CI

MH Chi-sq P value

OR/reciprocal

N

%

Age

Juveniles

124

15

12.10

6.9–19.2

P = 0.229

Sub-adults

96

17

17.71

10.7–26.8

Adults

148

26

17.57

11.8–24.7

Sex

Male

178

26

14.61

9.8–20.7

0.84/ 1.18

Female

190

32

16.84

11.8–22.9

Feed type

Free-ranging

154

23

14.94

9.7–21.6

0.90 / 1.11

Large-scale

214

35

16.36

11.7–22.0

Altitude

3700 m

135

15

11.11

6.4–17.7

P = 0.027

3200 m

121

19

15.70

9.7–23.4

2800 m

112

24

21.43

14.2–30.2

Risk factors for seropositivity of PRV

We evaluated four pre-identified probable risk factors including age, sex, feed type and altitude. Our results showed that feed type, altitude and age were significantly associated with an increase risk of PRV seropositivity in Tibetan pigs (Table 3).

Discussion

Pseudorabies virus has been reported in many countries and it was first reported in the 19th century in the United States [7, 13, 14]. Infectious diseases have been serious threat for animal health and productivity in developing countries [1519]. China is the world’s largest producer of swine, and PRV has become a major infectious disease threat to pig industry and causes serious issue. The lack of awareness and control measures against common infectious disease is a major cause of PRV in population. Although, the vaccination program was applied on many pig farms, but there were often occurrence and epidemic of this disease. The previous reports showed that the prevalence of PRV infection in pigs in Qinghai (4.80%), Sichuan (17.61%) and Yunnan (35.40%) provinces were very serious [5, 20, 21]. Tibetan pigs are mainly distributed in Qinghai, Sichuan, Yunnan and the eastern Tibet region. There are no previous published data regarding the prevalence of PRV infection in pigs. To the best of our knowledge, the present study provides the first report of PRV infection in Tibetan pigs.

In our study, the overall PRV seroprevalence was 15.76% in Tibetan pigs in Tibet, which was lower than that reported in pigs in Shandong (56.7%), Henan (53.7%), Beijing (24.0%), Tianjing (17.1%), Hebei (16.9%) and Liaoning (16.8%) [1, 8, 22, 23]. The low seropositivity of PRV in Tibetan pigs may be due to the evolution difference and unique characteristics of the plateau environment. On the other hand, Tibet’s unique mountains and rivers build a natural barrier to prevent or minimize the chances of spread of PRV.

Our results showed PRV infection among the different age groups of Tibetan pigs, a higher prevalence was detected in sub-adult (17.71%) or adult (17.57%) pigs, compared with the juveniles (12.10%). Some previous studies have also observed a higher seroprevalence of Aujeszky disease virus (ADV) between adults and juveniles [24]. However, non-significant difference (P > 0.05) was observed in PR seroprevalence between sex and feed type Tibetan pigs, which was different than the previous report [24]. Our results suggested that the incidence of PR was not related to the gender and feed type and there are several other possible reasons for this in Tibetan pigs. Firstly, it may be due to living in a similar environment and free-ranging system and secondly, each pig has the same chance to contact PRV [11, 25].

Hu et al. reported that the probability of reintroduction of PRV infection in large-scale Tibetan pig farms was positively different with free-ranging Tibetan pig farms [22]. However, our study has shown that feed type is associated with the infection of PRV. The subsequent univariate analysis indicated that the large-scale Tibetan pig farms were at higher risk for PRV seropositivity than free-ranging Tibetan pigs (OR: 1.11). Tibetan pigs are mainly fed by grazing in open environment [26]. Under such conditions, this animal gets more chance to expose to the external environment. Among these, sub-adults and adults have the longest time of outdoor activities which increases the risk of infection as compared with the juvenile Tibetan pigs.

Tibet is located in the Himalaya region and have high altitude with low temperature [10, 12, 26]. The local herdsmen have very less chance of interacting with the outside, which is not conducive to the survival of PRV. Tibet has unique mountains and rivers, forming a natural barrier structure, which is a different than reported earlier [27]. However, our study found that Tibetan pigs have been exposed to PRV and we discovered that the pigs living at low altitude (2800 m) were at higher risk for PRV seropositivity than those living at high altitude (3200 m and 3700 m). Current study reported PRV in Tibetan pig, and thus preventive and hygienic measures are suggested to minimize the serious economic losses. The vaccination, regular disinfection, and isolation of infected pigs are important to prevent the spread of PR from a particular area.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated the seroprevalence of PRV infection in Tibetan pigs, and found that feed type, age and altitude are major risk factors associated with PRV herd seropositivity and possible source for the spread of PRV in Tibetan pigs.

Abbreviations

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

PR: 

Pseudorabies

PRV: 

Pseudorabies virus

SAS: 

Statistical Analysis System

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thanked Jiakui Li (Huazhong Agricultural University) for his positive advice on experimental design.

Funding

This study was supported Key Science Fund of Science and Technology Agency of Tibet Autonomous Region, Key laboratory of clinical veterinary medicine in Tibet in project designing and sample collection and projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the 12th Five-year Plan Period (2012BAD3B03) helped in data interpretation. Research and Application of Non-Grain Feed Development for Tibetan pigs in winter and spring helped in manuscript drafting.

Availability of data and materials

All data is presented in this article is available upon request to corresponding author (Qingxia Wu).

Authors’ contributions

JK L, HY Z, HZ, QX W, HL D, KL, KM, MU R, SZ L, ZY C, FN and MTJ contributed to study design, data analysis, and manuscript writing along with participated sufficiently in final approval of the paper. JK L, HY Z, HZ and QX W conceived and designed the experiments; HL D, KL and MU R performed the experiments; SZ L, ZY C, FN, and MTJ contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools; SZ L, ZY C, and MTJ revised the manuscript. Furthermore, all the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

All experiments were approved and reviewed by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China following the national legislations regarding animal’s welfare. Furthermore, the owners of the slaughterhouses were inquired for getting verbal permission to conduct this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key laboratory of clinical veterinary medicine in Tibet, Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College, Linzhi, 860000, Tibet, People’s Republic of China
(2)
College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People’s Republic of China
(3)
University College of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, the Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan
(4)
Departmet of Pathology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan

References

  1. An TQ, Peng JM, Tian ZJ, Zhao HY, Li N, Liu YM, et al. Pseudorabies virus variant in Bartha-K61-vaccinated pigs, China, 2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015;19:1749–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Gu Z, Dong J, Wang J, Hou C, Sun H, Yang W, et al. A novel inactivated gE/gI deleted Pseudorabies virus (PRV) vaccine completely protects pigs from an emerged variant PRV challenge. Virus Res. 2015;195:57–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Klupp BG, Hengartner CJ, Mettenleiter TC, Enquist LW. Complete, annotated sequence of the pseudorabies virus genome. J Virol. 2004;78:424–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Kluge JP, Beran GW, Hill HT, Platt KB. Pseudorabies (Aujeszky’s disease). Disease Swine. 1999;8:233–46.Google Scholar
  5. Nie K, Li ZQ, Zeng Z, Yang ZL, Luo L. Seroepidemiological investigation and risk factor analysis of Pseudorabies in finishing pigs in some regions of Sichuan and Chongqing. J. Southwest Univ. 2013;35:7–12. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China, National middle-to-long term plan for animal disease control (2012–2020), the bulletin of the state Council of the People’s republic of China, 2012.Google Scholar
  7. Sun Y, Luo Y, Wang CH, Jin Y, Na L, Song K. Control of swine pseudorabies in china: opportunities and limitations. Vet Microbiol. 2016;183:119–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tong GZ, Chen HC. Pseudorabies epidemic status and control measures in China. China Journal Veterinary Science. 1999;19:1–2. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Wang CH, Yuan J, Qin H, Luo Y, Cong X, Li Y, et al. A novel gE-deleted Pseudorabies virus (PRV) provides rapid and complete protection from lethal challenge with the PRV variant emerging in Bartha-K61-vaccinated swine population in China. Vaccine. 2014;32:3379–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang H, Mujeeb UR, Li K, Luo HQ, Lan YF, Fazul N, et al. Epidemiologic survey of Japanese encephalitis virus infection, Tibet, China, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(6):1023–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang H, Mujeeb UR, Li K, Luo HQ, Lan YF, Fazul N, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated from Tibetan piglets suffering from white score diarrhea. Pak Vet J. 2016;37(1):43–6.Google Scholar
  12. Zhang H, Luo HQ, Mujeeb UR, Fazul N, Li K, Lan YF, et al. Evidence of JEV in Culex tritaeniorhynchus and pigs from high altitude regions of Tibet, China. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2017;54(1):69–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wu R, Bai CY, Sun JZ, Chang SK, Zhang X. Emergence of virulent pseudorabies virus infection in northern China. J. Vet. Sci. 2013;14:363–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Gortázar C, Vicente J, Fierro Y, León L, Cubero MJ, Gonzalez M. Natural Aujeszky’s disease in a Spanish wild boar population. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;969:210–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ali F, Hussain R, Qayyum A, Gul ST, Iqbal Z, Hassan MF. Milk somatic cell counts and some hemato-biochemical changes in sub-clinical mastitic dromedary she-camels (Camelus dromedarius). Pak Vet J. 2016;36:405–8.Google Scholar
  16. Elhaig MM, Selim A, Mahmoud MM, El-Gayar EK. Molecular confirmation of Trypanosoma evansi and Babesia bigemina in cattle from lower Egypt. Pak Vet J. 2016;36:409–14.Google Scholar
  17. Qayyum A, Khan JA, Hussain R, Avais M, Ahmad N, Khan MS. Investigation of milk and blood serum biochemical profile as an indicator of subclinical mastitis in Cholistani cattle. Pak Vet J. 2016;36:275–9.Google Scholar
  18. Wen XB, Jiang HT, Zhang YL, Lang XY, Liu J, Ni HB. Rapid and sensitive diagnosis of cattle anaplasmosis by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Pak Vet J. 2016;36:174–8.Google Scholar
  19. Yilmaz R, Cangul IT, Onat K, Akkoc A, Ozyigit MO, Akdesir E. Histopathological, immunohistochemical and bacteriological characterization of Mycoplasma bovis pneumonia in cattle. Pak Vet J. 2016;36:316–21.Google Scholar
  20. Qi XY. Seroprevalence of Pseudorabies, infection in pigs in Qinghai of China. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal Veterinary Science. 2015;9:137–8. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Shu XH, Yin GF, Li WG, Liu Y, Hou JF. Seroprevalence of respiratory disease, infection in pigs in some parts of Yunnan. China Animal Husbandry Veterinary. 2010;5:75–7. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Hu D, Lv L, Zhang Z, Xiao Y, Liu S. Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of pseudorabies in Shandong province of China. J Vet Sci. 2016;17:361–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu X, Zhou Z, Hu D, Han T, Li X. Pathogenic pseudorabies virus, China, 2012. Emerge Infectious Disease. 2015;20:102–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Vicente J, Ruizfons F, Vidal D, Höfle U, Acevedo P, Villanúa D. Serosurvey of Aujeszky's disease virus infection in European wild boar in Spain. Vet Res. 2005;156:408–12.Google Scholar
  25. Zhang XX, Lou ZZ, Huang SY, Zhou DD, Jia WZ, Su CL, et al. Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from Qinghai vole, plateau pika and Tibetan ground-tit on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau. China Parasite Vector. 2013;6:291.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang NZ, Zhou DH, Huang SY, Wang M, Shi XC, Ciren DB. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Haemophilus parasuis, infection in Tibetan pigs in Tibet. Acta Tropical. 2014;132:94–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Solymosi N, Reiczigel J, Berke O, Harnos A, Szigeti S, Fodor L, et al. Spatial risk assessment of herd sero-status of Aujeszky's disease in a county in Hungary. Prev. Vet. Med. 2004;65:9–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement