Table 3 Anaplasma positivity rates in goats from Hainan, China
County | No. tested | No. infected/(%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. ovis | A.phagocytophilum | A.bovis | A.capra | ||
Haikou | 49 | 0(0/49) | 0(0/49) | 24.5(12/49) | 0(0/49) |
Qiongzhong | 37 | 18.9(7/37) | 2.7(1/37) | 8.1(3/37) | 0(0/37) |
Dongfang | 36 | 0(0/36) | 2.7(1/36) | 5.6(2/36) | 0(0/36) |
Wenchang | 75 | 0(0/75) | 44.0(33/75) | 53.3(40/75) | 0(0/75) |
Changjing | 32 | 18.8(6/32) | 3.1(1/32) | 0(0/32) | 0(0/32) |
Danzhou | 29 | 20.7(6/29) | 6.9 (2/29) | 13.8(4/29) | 0(0/29) |
Dingan | 65 | 0(0/65) | 6.2 (5/65) | 35.4(23/65) | 0(0/65) |
Wuzhishan | 21 | 0(0/21) | 0(0/21) | 0(0/21) | 0(0/21) |
Qionghai | 22 | 9.1(2/22) | 4.5(1/22) | 13.6 (3/22) | 0(0/22) |
Lingshui | 26 | 1.0 (1/26) | 0(0/26) | 25.0 (6/26) | 0(0/26) |
Baisha | 96 | 0(0/96) | 29.2(28/96) | 38.5(37/96) | 0(0/96) |
Chengmai | 50 | 0(0/50) | 54.0(27/50) | 58.0(29/50) | 50.0(25/50) |
Baoting | 21 | 0(0/21) | 4.8(1/21) | 4.8(1/21) | 0(0/21) |
Wanning | 31 | 13.2(5/31) | 6.4 (2/31) | 16.1(5/31) | 0(0/31) |
Ledong | 38 | 27.5(11/38) | 0(0/38) | 0(0/38) | 0(0/38) |
Tunchang | 40 | 27.5(11/40) | 0(0/40) | 2.5(1/40) | 0(0/40) |
Lingao | 34 | 0(0/34) | 0(0/34) | 0(0/34) | 0(0/34) |
Sanya | 29 | 0(0/29) | 0(0/290) | 0(0/29) | 0(0/29) |
Total | 731 | 5.2(38/731) | 13.8(101/731) | 22.7(166/731) | 3.4(25/731) |