Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Plants of the Cerrado with antimicrobial effects against Staphylococcus spp. and Escherichia coli from cattle

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1, 3Email author
BMC Veterinary ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201814:32

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1351-1

  • Received: 6 January 2017
  • Accepted: 16 January 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Both diarrhea in calves and mastitis in cows limit cattle production. The bacteria involved in these diseases have shown multi-resistance to antimicrobials, however plant metabolites therefore can provide an alternative method of control. This study selected and characterized Cerrado plant extracts showing inhibitory effects against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus spp. from cattle. Thirteen leaf extracts were initially screened and diameters of inhibition zones produced against the pathogens were recorded using an agar disk diffusion method. Total condensed tannin contents were determined and antibacterial activities were analyzed after tannin removal from the five selected extracts. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) were evaluated by macro-dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests, and the extracts were characterized by high performance liquid chromatography.

Results

Inter- and intra-specific bacterial variations in the susceptibility to the extracts were detected. The aqueous extract (AE) from Caryocar brasiliense Cambess. leaves produced larger inhibition zones against E. coli strains than did other selected extracts. However, the AE from Schinopsis brasiliensis was the most effective against Staphylococcus spp. strains (P < 0.001). The MIC of ethanolic extracts (EE) from C. brasiliense (0.27 mg/mL) and S. brasiliensis (0.17 mg/mL) were lower than those of other extracts. The MIC and MBC of the Annona crassiflora EE were 6.24 mg/mL for all bacteria. Flavonoids were the main metabolites detected in the A. crassiflora EE as well as in the AE and EE from C. brasiliense, while tannins were the main metabolites in the S. brasiliensis leaf extracts.

Conclusion

The AE from C. brasiliense was more effective against Gram-negative bacteria, while the AE from S. brasiliensis was more effective against Gram-positive bacteria. A. crassiflora EE and S. brasiliensis extracts are potent bactericide. After removal of the tannins, no antimicrobial effects were observed, indicating that these metabolites are the main active antibacterial components.

Keywords

  • Antibacterial
  • Brazilian savannah
  • Colibacillosis
  • Mastitis
  • Medicinal plants
  • Staphylococcus Aureus
  • Staphylococcus haemolyticus

Background

Diseases must be prevented or controlled in order to achieve a sustainable and viable production of ruminants. Diarrhea is the most common pathology in young calves and Escherichia coli represents one of its main etiological agents [1, 2]. Mastitis, caused by the Staphylococcus spp., is the most important disorder in cows, and leads to reduced milk production and increased production costs [3, 4]. These bacteria have shown multi-resistance to antimicrobials in different continents and present a public health risk [2, 57].

Plant metabolites are considered alternative control agents for the reduction of resistant microorganisms and antimicrobial residues in foods of animal origin [57]. Scientific literature has frequently reported the inhibitory action of certain plant extracts against bacteria in humans [7, 8]. However, few studies have showed effective plant extracts inhibiting microorganisms from ruminants or other animals. Extracts from Solanum paniculatum L. (Jurubeba) and Punica granatum L. (Romã) display antibacterial effects against microorganisms that cause bovine mastitis [9], and Rhodomyrtus tomentosa L. (rose myrtle) leaf extract shows potent antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus in milk [10]. Tannins are the main antimicrobial metabolites in vegetal extracts, and also inhibit enzymes and alter metabolism via membrane or cell wall interactions [11].

The Cerrado, a type of savannah present in South America, is native to more than 10,000 plant species that contain natural products for phytotherapy [12]. With regards to alternative antibacterial agents, four medicinal plants from the Brazilian Cerrado have been shown to inhibit the growth of S. aureus [13], and the leaf extract from Schinopsis brasiliensis Engl. is effective against multidrug-resistant S. aureus [14].

However, the antimicrobial activity of plant species from the Brazilian Cerrado against animal pathogens has not been fully explored. Extracts from these plants that show antibacterial effects could favor the alternative controls, thereby reducing pathogen multi-resistance. In organic animal production systems, the use of these extracts would enable the production of foods free from antimicrobial residues, thus increasing the value of these animal products.

In this study, plant species commonly found in the Cerrado were selected and their antimicrobial activities were evaluated against isolates of E. coli and Staphylococcus spp. from cattle. To identify the main antibacterial components, these extracts were characterized by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and inhibitory activity was analyzed after tannin removal.

Methods

Microorganisms

The antibacterial effects of the plant extracts were evaluated against three Staphylococcus isolates (S178, S135, and S182) from cows with mastitis. These bacteria were isolated and cultured on mannitol salt agar, and evaluated based on colony characteristics, Gram staining, catalase reaction, and coagulase test. We also assessed the inhibitory effects of the extracts on two E. coli isolates (E2 and E3) from the feces of dairy calves with diarrhea. These were isolated and cultured on MacConkey agar and colony characteristics, Gram staining, and catalase reactions were evaluated. These animals were raised on an experimental farm in northern Minas Gerais, Brazil. In addition, the human clinical isolates S. aureus ATCC 25923 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were included as reference strains. All bacteria were cultured in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth, and subsamples were stored at − 80 °C after glycerol inclusion (1:1).

DNA from these bovine isolates was extracted and amplified as described by Chapaval et al. [15]. DNA samples were amplified via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′), as described by Lane [16]. 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) was sequenced following the method described by Sanger [17], using the automatic sequencer MegaBACE® 1000 (GE Life Sciences, USA), according to Reysenbach et al. [18]. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was verified using the SeqScanner Software® v1.0 (Applied Biosystems, USA), and the results were compared online by BLAST (database from NCBI - https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The bacteria species were identified with a similarity level of at least 99%.

Antibacterial susceptibility

The procedure for the agar disk diffusion method was performed in triplicate, according to recommendations by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) [19]. For Staphylococcus strains, the following antimicrobial discs were added onto the medium surface: chloramphenicol, 30 μg; erythromycin, 15 μg; vancomycin, 30 μg; oxacillin, 1 μg; gentamicin, 10 μg; tetracycline, 30 μg; clindamycin, 2 μg; and penicillin, 10 μg. For E. coli strains, the following were used: chloramphenicol, 30 μg; ampicillin, 10 μg; gentamicin, 10 μg; ciprofloxacin, 5 μg; tetracycline, 30 μg; and norfloxacin, 10 μg, as described by the NCCLS [19]. For quality control purposes, the strains ATCC 25923 and ATCC 25922 were used. All plates were incubated at 35 °C for 24 h, and inhibition zones (mm) were measured and the bacteria were classified as resistant or sensitive according to the NCCLS guidelines [19].

Plant extracts

Plant leaves were collected from April to June at the Institute of Agricultural Sciences, UFMG, in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil. This region is located at latitude 16°51′ and longitude 44°55′, and the climate is tropical and humid with dry summers (A) according to Köppen classification [20].

Vegetal materials were collected from Caryocar brasiliense Camb. (Caryocaraceae), Annona crassiflora Mart. (Annonaceae), S. brasiliensis Engl. (Anacardiaceae), Piptadenia viridiflora (Kunth) Benth. (Fabaceae), Serjania lethalis A.St.-Hil. (Sapindaceae), Casearia sylvestris (Flacourtiaceae), and Ximenia americanaL. (Olacaceae). Plant samples were deposited in the Montes Claros Herbarium of Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, as voucher specimens 338, 1492, 377, 2283, 2249, 3008, and 211, respectively.

The leaves were carefully inspected, and those with gross lesions or damage were discarded. Selected leaves were dehydrated under forced air circulation (TE 394/4, Tecnal Equipamentos Científicos Tecnal, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil) at 38 °C for 72 h, crushed in a blender, and stored inside paper bags in the dark at − 4 °C [11, 21].

Aqueous extracts (AEs) were produced by placing the ground dried leaves in a distilled water bath at 40 °C for 60 min. Ethanolic extracts (EEs) were obtained from macerated dried leaves held in absolute ethanol in amber-colored glass containers in the dark for seven days. Extracts were filtered through a gauze funnel and subsequently evaporated at 40 °C for 48 h under forced air circulation until completely dry and stored at 4 °C until use [11]. In this study, both EEs and AEs were completely soluble in distilled water and did not require any other solvents for antimicrobial analysis.

Subsamples of extracts were subjected to tannin extraction according to the method described by Nyman et al. [22]. Extracts were dissolved in water (1 g per 20 mL) at 90 °C and cooled to room temperature. After reaching a temperature of 30 °C, 0.2 μL 10% NaCl was added, and 1 mL of this solution was combined with 4 mL 1% gelatin solution before centrifuging at 1800×g for 6 min. Supernatants were used to assess the effects of tannin-free extracts.

Characterization of extracts

A Waters Alliance 2695 HPLC system comprising a quaternary pump, auto-sampler, photodiode array detector (DAD) 2996, and Waters Empower Pro data handling system (Waters Corporation, Milford, Connecticut, USA) were used for extract characterization. Analyses were performed on a LiChrospher 100 RP-18 column (250 × 4 mm, 5 mm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) combined with a LiChrospher 100 RP-18 guard column (4 × 4 mm, 5 mm; Merck) at 40 °C. Water (A) and acetonitrile (B) were used as eluents, both containing 0.1% (v/v) H3PO4 at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min as follows: 0 min, 95% A and 5% B; 60 min, 5% A, 95% B, followed by 10 min isocratic elution. Solvents used were of HPLC grade (Merck, Germany) and were degassed by sonication before use. Chromatograms were obtained at 210 nm, and the UV spectra were recorded online from 190 to 400 nm.

The dried crude extracts were dissolved in methanol (HPLC-grade), ultrapure water, or hydroethanolic solutions according to their solubility, to concentrations of 10 mg/mL. After centrifugation at 8400×g for 10 min, 10 mL sample were automatically injected into the apparatus.

The total condensed tannin (proanthocyanidins) content of the extracts was determined by measuring the absorbance of cyanidin chloride resulting from acid-catalyzed solvolysis with n-BuOH/HCl 12 M (95:5) at 540 nm, according to the method described by Hiermann et al. [23]. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate and the total condensed tannin content, expressed as cyanidin chloride, was calculated using the following formula:

Condensed tannins % = Absorbance (sample) − Absorbance (blank) × 4.155/sample weight (g).

Selection of plant extracts with inhibitory effects

Seven ethanolic and six aqueous extracts were diluted with distilled water at 0.1 g extract/mL and vortexed for 3 min. Extracts were used immediately after this preparation. Antibacterial activity was determined using the agar disk diffusion method [19, 24].

A loopful of bacteria was inoculated onto BHI agar under sterile conditions, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Turbidity equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard was used as a reference to adjust for approximately 108 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. One hundred microliters of freshly prepared inoculum suspension were spread on Mueller-Hinton agar using sterile swabs [19]. Eight microliters of extract solution was added to 6-mm paper filter disks, allocated onto the surface of the seeded plates, and incubated at 35 °C for 24 h. Inhibition zones were then measured using a digital caliper [8]. In this screening assay, all procedures were performed in duplicate.

Based on the largest zones of inhibition and the broadest spectrum of action, five extracts were selected, both with and without tannins. These extracts were filtered through a 0.2-μm Millipore membrane and aliquots were then submitted to dry matter (dm) determination in an oven at 105 °C, in order to standardize them at 1.58 mg dm/mL. Paper filter disks with sterile saline solution (without extract) and discs containing the extracts incubated without bacteria were used as controls [8, 24]. The experiment was designed in a factorial arrangement (5 extracts × 7 bacterial strains) and all procedures were performed in triplicate. The inhibition zone averages were compared by the analysis of variance using Scott-Knott’s test at the 5% significance level, using the System for Statistical Analysis software (SAEG 9.1).

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)

After filtration of the extracts, we determined the MIC necessary to inhibit the growth of the microorganism by macro-dilution in Mueller-Hinton broth, as described by the NCCLS [25].

Using a 1:2 dilution with an equal volume of medium, the final concentrations (6.24–0.01 mg/mL) were evaluated. However, for MBC determinations of the C. brasiliensis extracts were also evaluated concentrations up to 40 mg/mL. Extract solutions were therefore prepared at double the final concentration [25]. Completing at final volume of 5 mL, 120 μL of bacteria inoculum prepared as reported above were added together with 2.48 mL Mueller Hinto broth and 2.5 mL of extract solution.

For the controls, we used growth control tubes containing broth without extract for each bacterium tested, tubes without bacteria containing broth alone or added of extracts. All tubes were incubated at 35 °C for 24 h in a thermo-shaker incubator (Novatécnica, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) to ensure homogenization. After this period, bacterial growth was assessed using 125 μL 0.5% triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) solution, which indicates cellular multiplication through the development of a reddish color in the presence of viable cells, thus enabling MIC determination [26].

Subsequently, the MBC was determined, which represents the lowest concentration of the extract necessary to achieve complete suppression of bacterial growth. One hundred-microliter aliquots from the tubes used for the MIC assay and the control tubes without extracts were inoculated on Mueller-Hinton agar and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The absence of bacterial growth on the agar plate was evaluated to determine MBC, and the experiment was carried out in triplicate.

Results

Characterization of bacterial isolates

Using molecular analysis, we successfully identified isolate S178 as S. aureus and isolates S135 and S182 as S. haemolyticus (99.9% similarity). Strains E2 and E3 were identified as E. coli, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Bacterial identification by 16S rDNA sequencing and classification according to BLAST (NCBI database)

Isolates

Origen

Number of analyzed nucleotides

Identification with similarity > 99%

S178

Cow whit matitis

551

Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus strain NCTC 8325

S135

Cow whit matitis

553

Staphylococcus haemolyticus strain JCSC1435

S182

Cow whit matitis

550

Staphylococcus haemolyticus strain v JCSC1435

E2

Calf with diarrhea

590

Escherichia coli str. K-12 substr. strain MG1655

E3

Calf with diarrhea

574

Escherichia coli str. K-12 substr. strain MG1655

Isolate S178 (S. aureus) was resistant to erythromycin, clindamycin, oxacillin, penicillin, tetracycline, and vancomycin. However, S. haemolyticus isolates were sensitive to all antimicrobials tested in gram-positive strains. All E. coli strains were resistant to tetracycline, while isolate E3 was also resistant to ampicillin and gentamicin (Table 2).
Table 2

Antimicrobial sensitivity profiles for Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, and Escherichia coli isolates from cattle and standard strains

 

S. haemolyticus

S. aureus

E. coli

Antibacterial

S135

S182

S178

ATCC

E2

E3

ATCC

Chloramphenicol

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

Erythromycin

S

S

R

S

Ampicillin

S

I

S

Vancomycin

S

S

R

R

Oxacillin

S

S

R

R

Gentamicin

S

S

S

S

S

I

I

Ciprofloxacin

S

S

S

Tetracycline

S

S

R

S

R

I

R

Clindamycin

S

S

R

R

Penicillin

S

S

R

R

Norfloxacin

S

S

S

chloramphenicol 30 μg, erythromycin 15 μg, ampicillin 10 μg, vancomycin 30 μg, oxacillin 1 μg, gentamicin 10 μg, ciprofloxacin 5 μg, tetracycline 30 μg, clindamycin 2 μg, penicillin 10 μg e norfloxacin 10 μg. S Sensitive, I Intermediate, R Resistant, according to NCCLS (2005)

Selection of antimicrobial extracts from Cerrado plants

The initial screen revealed that all extracts presented inhibitory effects on at least one of the evaluated bacterial strains. However, the EE from X. americana did not show any inhibitory effects on E. coli or S. haemolyticus strains (Table 3). The EE and AE from C. brasiliense and EEs from A. crassiflora, S. brasiliensis, and S. lethalis presented antagonism against all Staphylococcus spp. strains. The different phenological stages of C. brasiliense produced leaf extracts showing inhibitory effects against S. aureus and S. haemolyticus (Table 3). Inhibition zone measurements were not associated with tannin content in the extracts tested (P > 0.05, Pearson correlation).
Table 3

Selection of vegetal extracts according to inhibition zones (mm) produced in Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus haemolyticus after addition of extracts from Cerrado plant leaves in an agar diffusion test

Vegetal species

Extracts

Tannin content (%)

S. haemolyticus

S. aureus

Escherichia coli

135 AE

182

178

ATCC

E2

E3

ATCC

Caryocar brasiliense in flowering

Ethanolic

1.99 ± 0.12

26.7 ± 2.5

14.1 ± 1.9

30.2 ± 3.4

20.2 ± 3.3

0.0

0.0

19.0 ± 1.9

C.brasiliense in flowering

Aqueous

1.37 ± 0.08

23.5 ± 3.5

14.3 ± 1.8

21.8 ± 2.4

19.3 ± 2.3

0.0

0.0

14.2 ± 2.7

C. brasiliense in fruiting

Aqueous

1.25 ± 0.02

24.3 ± 2.6

14.0 ± 2,7

21.0 ± 2.0

23.8 ± 2.0

0.0

0.0

16.4 ± 3.7

C. brasiliense flowerless and fruitless

Aqueous

2.66 ± 0.22

20.2 ± 2.0

11.1 ± 2.6

16.2 ± 4.1

15.8 ± 3.1

0.0

0.0

13.8 ± 5.0

Annona crassiflora

Aqueous

2.59 ± 1.47

12.8 ± 2.3

0.0

15.9 ± 2.7

13.1 ± 4.0

0.0

8.0 ± 3.0

0.0

Annona crassiflora

Ethanolic

4.20 ± 2.38

9.3 ± 2.1

14.5 ± 1.2

15.9 ± 3.1

14.6 ± 3.4

0.0

19.8 ± 4.1

11.1 ± 3.4

Piptadenia viridiflora

Aqueous

0.23 ± 0.01

16.4 ± 2.3

0.0

19.1 ± 3.1

0.0

0.0

11.5 ± 2.7

29.9 ± 5.5

Piptadenia viridiflora

Ethanolic

1.75 ± 0.21

9.0 ± 0.95

0.0

13.3 ± 3.3

17.1 ± 3.1

0.0

0.0

27.0 ± 4.9

Schinopsis brasiliensis

Aqueous

0.16 ± 0.37

16.4 ± 2.3

18.0 ± 0.3

24.1 ± 2.9

20.8 ± 3.1

9.4 ± 1.0

0.0

22.3 ± 3.3

Schinopsis brasiliensis

Ethanolic

0.72 ± 0.34

21.7 ± 3.6

21.2 ± 4.3

22.5 ± 2.7

22.8 ± 2.3

0.0

16.2 ± 3.4

20.6 ± 5.6

Serjania lethalis

Ethanolic

6.37 ± 0.29

13.2 ± 2.5

11.0 ± 2.2

14.5 ± 3.0

18.5 ± 4.7

0.0

10.0 ± 3.0

11.7 ± 4.6

Casearia sylvestris

Ethanolic

7.36 ± 0.54

8.2 ± 1.3

0.0

10.9 ± 2.0

7.5 ± 4.3

0.0

0.0

15.0 ± 3.8

Ximenia americana

Ethanolic

0.29 ± 0.02

0.0

0.0

0.0

24.2 ± 4.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

The EE from A. crassiflora, and EEs and AEs from S. brasiliensis and C. brasiliense were selected owing to their inhibitory effects, which produced large inhibition zones. We also considered whether plants acted on one bacterial species or on both, the latter showing a broader spectrum of action. These extracts were sterilized by filtration and concentrations were standardized to 1.58 mg/mL to compare their effects via diffusion tests in agar.

When evaluating the effects of the five selected extracts on the seven bacterial strains, differences between the type of extract, the plant species, and the strain and species of bacteria were detected (P < 0.001). Consequently, interactions between the type of extract evaluated and the bacterial strain were also significant (P < 0.01, Table 4). After removal of the tannins, no inhibitory effects were observed for the selected extracts (Table 4).
Table 4

Average inhibition zones (mm) produced in an agar diffusion test in Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, and Escherichia coli treated with leaf extracts from Annona Crassiflora, Caryocar brasiliense, and Schinopsis brasiliensis with (TA) or without (WT) tannins (1.58 mg/mL)

Bacteria Strainsa

A. crassiflora Ethanolic-

C. brasiliense Ethanolic

C. brasiliense Aqueous

S. brasiliensis Ethanolic

S. brasiliensis Aqueous

TA

WT

TA

WT

TA

WT

TA

WT

TA

WT

S135

7.3 ± 0,67 Dd

0

8.1 ± 0,11 Ce

0

6.1 ± 0,08 Ed

0

9.4 ± 0,27 Bb

0

10.0 ± 0,18 Ac

0

S182

6.9 ± 0,38 Ce

0

6.5 ± 0,20 Dg

0

6.1 ± 0,11 Ed

0

9.3 ± 0,22 Bb

0

10.8 ± 0,33 Ac

0

S178

8.6 ± 0,47 Dc

0

8.4 ± 0,04 Dd

0

6.1 ± 0,11 Ed

0

9.1 ± 0,29 Bb

0

9.8 ± 0,11 Ac

0

ATCC 25923

7.0 ± 0,06 Ee

0

7.3 ± 0,18 Df

0

9.4 ± 0,4 Cc

0

10.2 ± 0,22 Ba

0

15.1 ± 0,18 Aa

0

E2

9.8 ± 0,31 Ba

0

8.9 ± 0,18 Dc

0

14.1 ± 0,18 Ab

0

6.2 ± 0,07 Ec

0

9.3 ± 0,22 Cc

0

E3

9.5 ± 0,76 Cb

0

9.4 ± 0,27 Db

0

14.8 ± 0,27 Aa

0

6.1 ± 0,15 c

0

12.4 ± 1,44 Bb

0

ATCC 25922

10.1 ± 0,53 Da

0

11.3 ± 0,2 Ca

0

14.5 ± 0,44 Aa

0

8.5 ± 0,29 Ec

0

11.9 ± 0,22 Bb

0

Lowercase letters in lines indicate significant difference between bacteria strains and uppercase letters in columns indicate significant difference between plant extracts as determined by Scoott-Knott’test with a 5% significance

a S. haemolyticus (S135 and S182); S. aureus (S178 and ATCC 25923) and E. coli (E2,E3 and ATCC25922)

The AE from S. brasiliensis produced larger inhibition zones against Staphylococcus spp. strains than other extracts. However, considering the E. coli strains, the C. brasiliense AE produced the largest areas of inhibition among all the extracts (Table 4, P < 0.001).

The MICs observed for the EEs from S. brasiliensis and C. brasiliense were lower than A. crassiflora EE. Both the MIC and MBC of the A. crassiflora EE were 6.24 mg/mL for all bacterial strains (Table 5).
Table 5

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bacterial concentration (MBC) of leaf extracts from Annona Crassiflora, Caryocar brasiliense, and Schinopsis brasiliensis tested on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus spp. from cattle

Bacteria strainsa

Annona crassiflora

Caryocar brasiliense

Schinopsis brasiliensis

Ethanolic mg/mL

Ethanolic mg/mL

Aqueous mg/mL

Ethanolic mg/mL

Aqueous mg/mL

MIC

MBC

MIC

MBC

MIC

MBC

MIC

MBC

MIC

MBC

Staphylococcus spp.

 S135

6.24

6.24

0.27

>  40.0

0.71

0.71

0.17

0.34

0.42

0.42

 S182

6.24

6.24

0.27

>  40.0

0.71

0.71

0.17

0.68

0.42

0.84

 S178

6.24

6.24

0.27

>  40.0

0.71

>  40.0

0.17

0.34

0.42

0.42

 ATCC 25923

6.24

6.24

0.27

>  40.0

0.71

0.71

0.17

0.68

0.42

0.84

Escherichia coli

 E2

6.24

6.24

0.27

>  40.0

0.71

>  40.0

0.17

0.34

0.10

0.42

 E3

6.24

6.24

0.27

>  40.0

0.71

0.71

0.17

0.34

0.42

0.42

 ATCC 25922

6.24

6.24

0.27

30.0

0.71

>  40.0

0.17

0.34

0.42

0.42

aS. haemolyticus (S135 and S182); S. aureus (S178 and ATCC 25923) and E. coli (E2, E3 and ATCC25922)

Reversed-phase HPLC characterization of selected plant extracts

According to the UV spectra observed, the presence of flavonoids was detected in the region between 261 and 279.3 nm for the EE from A. crassiflora (Fig. 1), and EE and AE from C. brasiliense (Fig. 2). Tannins were detected in the EE and AE of S. brasiliensis, with absorbance at 257–263 nm for the respective retention times (Fig. 3).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

HPLC chromatographic profile, retention times (RT), and UV (279.3 nn) spectrum characteristics of flavonoids, in panels inside the image, in the ethanolic extract from Annona crassiflora (first RT = 6.484 min).

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

HPLC chromatographic profiles, retention times (RT), and UV spectrum characteristics of flavonoids in extracts: a Caryocar brasiliense, ethanolic (RT = 1.284 min and UV =274.5); b C. brasiliense, aqueous (RT = 1.378 min and UV=261.5)

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

HPLC chromatographic profiles, retention times (RT), and UV spectrum characteristics of tannins in extracts: a Schinopsis brasiliensis, ethanolic (RT = 1.053 min and UV = 257.9); b Schinopsis brasiliensis, aqueous (RT = 1.054 min and UV=263.9)

Discussion

In this study, six plants showed inhibitory effect against the three bacterial species evaluated, indicating the importance of bioprospecting studies on Cerrado vegetation. We observed intra- and inter-species differences in the bacterial susceptibility to plant extracts, which should be clarified in future investigations.

The differences in inhibition zones produced by the five selected extracts could be associated with their biochemical compositions, polarity, and solubility in Muller-Hinton agar. Additionally the interactions and the differences of extract constituents of the extracts could explain their spectra of action against Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria.

In agar diffusion test, the best inhibitory action against the Gram-negative E. coli strains was promoted by C. brasiliense AE which contained flavonoids. However, the AE from S. brasiliensis, containing tannins, produced larger inhibition zones in the Gram-positive Staphylococcus spp. strains than did other extracts. We suggested intra-specific variations in bacterial response to the extracts, considering the different effects of these extracts against human clinical strains (E. coli ATCC 25922 and S. aureus ATCC 25923) and respective bovine isolates. The different hosts could lead to the selection of external or internal variations in these bacteria, which could influence their susceptibly to these extracts. However, this would need to be elucidated in future research.

A specific mechanism of action against Staphylococcus spp. or E. coli could be explained by differences in cell wall constitutions of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [27]. Specific constituents in C. brasiliense extracts such as saponins and flavonoids could be more toxic to walls with greater lipid contents, as was observed in E. coli [28, 29].

We detected that a lower number of the effective extracts against the Gram-negative bacteria. In another antibacterial screening of plants from the Cerrado revealed that the stem bark extracts from Qualea grandiflora Mart (Vochysiaceae), Virola surinamensis (Rol.) Warb (Myristicaceae), and Hancornia speciosa Gome (Apocynaceae) significantly inhibited S. aureus but were not effective against E. coli [13].

The results obtained in this research corroborate with those of the study by Lima et al. [30] that evaluated the in vitro antimicrobial activity of EEs (1:1) from leaves, fruits, and seeds of A. crassiflora against Staphylococcus spp. The authors showed that these extracts significantly inhibited bacterial growth with a mean inhibition zone of 10 to 12 mm. Silva et al. [31] also reported inhibition zones of 10 to 14 mm when analyzing the effects of A. crassiflora leaf extracts against multi-resistant human S. aureus.

Considering antibacterial effects of C brasiliensis, unlike the leaf extracts in our study, bark extracts used at 500 mg/mL showed no inhibition when tested against the reference strains of S. aureus and E. coli [32]. These results indicate the leaves, which are more available, as sustainable source of the antibacterial metabolites of this plant.

Analyzing the MICs observed in this research, the EEs and AEs from S. brasiliensis and C. brasiliense were more effective against all bacterial strains than A. crassiflora extract. However MBC values were different among the bacterial strains, thus showing intra-specific variations. The EE of C. brasileiense showed bacteriostatic effect while other extracts were bactericides.

Although of few scientific studies describe antagonistic effects of plant extracts against Gram-negative bacteria, we detected that the extracts from C. brasiliense and S. brailiensis had lower MICs against E. coli strains than other studies. Paula-Junior et al. [28] reported that the hydroethanolic extract from C. brasiliense leaves exhibited MIC values of 4 mg/mL against E. coli and S. aureus, and Amaral et al. [33] described higher MICs for C. brasiliense EE against E. coli ATCC 25922 (MIC of 11.25 mg/mL) and S. aureus ATCC 6538 (22.5 mg/mL).

In other study, low MICs have also been reported for S. brasiliensis, E. coli ATCC 9723, and multi-resistant S. aureus isolates, with values varying from 0.025 to 0.100 mg/mL, depending on the fraction of extracts [14].

In this study, the EE of A. crassiflora showed MIC and MBC of 6.4 mg/mL for all bacteria evaluated, indicating this extract is safe and can ensure complete inhibition or death of these microorganisms. Silva et al. [31] evaluated the effects of leaf extract of this plant against oxacillin-resistant human S. aureus and ATCC 6538, and observed higher MICs (25 mg/mL) for both strains. Furthermore, the authors identified alkaloids and flavonoids as the active compounds.

Considering HPLC analysis, the EE of A. crassiflora and both extracts from C. brasiliense presented flavonoids while the tannins were main components detected for S. brasiliensis extracts. However, these analyses cannot reveal the concentration or chemical structure of these metabolites. The characterization of these extracts by other methods, such as gas chromatography after derivation, could reveal reveal the contents of their specific antibacterial components.

In this study, inhibitory effects were no observed after tannin removal from the selected extracts, indicating that this metabolite represented the main antibacterial agent in these extracts. Future studies should elucidate the mechanism of action of these extracts, and whether such effects can be linked to a group of substances promoting bacterial inhibition.

The antimicrobial role of these plant metabolites has not yet been clearly elucidated. However, there is a consensus of multiple mechanisms of action on bacterial cells. The tannins can interact with the cytoplasmic membrane, inhibiting its function and thereby compromising cellular integrity [11]. These compounds could also inhibit nucleic acid and enzymes synthesis, modify the cellular metabolism via membrane interaction, and complex with metal ions to decrease its availability for the microorganisms [34]. The antibacterial activity of flavonoids has been attributed to inhibition of DNA gyrase, inhibition of cytoplasmic membrane function, and energy metabolism. These compounds represent a novel source that can be utilized to develop pharmacologically acceptable antimicrobial agents [35].

Other studies have characterized the main metabolites of the plants selected in this research. Phytochemical tests of C. brasiliense identified condensed tannins, hydrolyzed tannins, flavonoids, terpenoids, and saponins, which could contribute synergistically with antibacterial effects [28, 29]. In the A. crassiflora extracts, alkaloids, acetogenins, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds have previously been detected [36].

We used the disk-diffusion assay for the antimicrobial screening of plant extracts which showed simplicity and low cost as reported by Balouiri et al. [37]. However, bactericidal and bacteriostatic effects were not distinguished and special attention should be given to the standardization of bacterial inocula and microbial procedures to reduce the variability of measures of the inhibition zones. The selected leaf extracts of native plants from the Cerrado showed inhibitory effects against three bacterial species related to mastitis or colibacillosis in cattle; both diseases that have caused significant economic loss in cattle production in several continents. The E. coli strains used were resistant to tetracycline and the S178 S. aureus isolate was multi-resistant. These results could be explained by bovine herds infected with S. aureus and E. coli being frequently treated with antimicrobials to control mastitis or colibacillosis [2, 3].

The selected extracts from native plants of the Cerrado could prove to be alternative agents for the control of colibacillosis, mastitis, and other diseases associated with these bacteria, after toxicity studies and in vivo tests are performed. The specific metabolites present in these extract could be essential to control resistant or multi-resistant bacterial strains.

Conclusion

In this research, Staphylococcus spp. and E. coli were sensitive to leaf extracts of native plants from the Cerrado. Inter- and intra-specific bacterial variations were detected with regards to extract susceptibility. Notably, the A. crassiflora EE and S. brasiliensis extracts show potent bactericidal activity. After removal of the tannins, no antimicrobial effects were observed, indicating these metabolites are the main active antibacterial components.

Abbreviation

AE: 

Aqueous extract

EE: 

Ethanolic extract

MBC: 

Minimum bactericidal concentrations

MIC: 

Minimum inhibitory concentrations

Declarations

Acknowledgements

To the Professor Anna Christina de Almeida who provided the bacterial strains of cow mastitis.

Funding

This study was supported by CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerias (FAPEMIG) and Pró-reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study and voucher number of the plants are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

ERD conceived, designed and coordinated the study. ICOR, EGAM, FMC, FMCA, MRS participated in data collection, analyses and drafting the manuscript. ERD and ICOR finalized and submitted the manuscript for publication. All the authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

The bacterial isolates were collected in previous experiments submitted and approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experiments of the UFMG (protocol no 39/2009 and 145/2013), regulated by the National Council for Control of Animal Experimentation of Brazil.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors of this manuscript have no financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Instituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Universitária, 1000, Bairro Universitário, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, CEP 39401-790, Brazil
(2)
Escola de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antonio Carlos, 6627 Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-901, Brazil
(3)
Instituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av Universitária 1000, Bairro Universitario, Montes Claros, MG, 39400-006, Brazil

References

  1. Salvadori MR, Valadares GF, Leite DS, Blanco J, Yano T. Virulence factors of Escherichia coli isolated from calves with diarrhea in Brazil. Brazil J Microbiol. 2003;34:230–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Duse A, Waller KP, Emanuelson U, Unnerstad HE, Persson Y, Bengtsson B. Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98:500–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Su X, Howell AB, D’Souza DH. Antibacterial effects of plant-derived extracts on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012;9:573–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Saidi R, Khelef D, Kaidi R. Bovine mastitis: prevalence of bacterial pathogens and evaluation of early screening test. Afr J Microbio Res. 2013;7:777–82.Google Scholar
  5. Toyang NJ, Wanyama J, Nuwanyakpa M, Django S. Ethnoveterinary medicine: a practical approach to the treatment of cattle diseases in sub-Saharan 2 ed Africa Roosendaal. Netherlands: Agromisa Foundation and CTA; 2007.Google Scholar
  6. Sampimon OC, Lam TJGM, Mevius DJ, Schukken YH, Zadoks RN. Antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine milk samples. Vet Microbiol. 2011;150:173–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Samoilova Z, Smirnova G, Muzyka N, Oktyabrskya O. Medicinal plant extracts variously modulate susceptibility of Escherichia coli to different antibiotics. Microbiol Res. 2014;169:307–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ammer MR, Zaman S, Khalid M, Bilal M, Erum S, Huang D Che S. Optimization of antibacterial activity of Eucalyptus tereticornis leaf extracts against Escherichia coli through response surface methodology. J Radiation Res Appl Sc. 2016;9:376–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Pereira AV, Silva VA, Freitas AFR, Pereira MSV, Trevisan LFA, Costa MRM. Extratos vegetais: atividade antimicrobiana e genética sobre plasmídios de resistência a antibióticos em microrganismos. Rev Biol Farmac. 2010;4:60–5.Google Scholar
  10. Mordmuang A, Voravuthikunchai SP. Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Aiton) Hassk leaf extract: an alternative approach for the treatment of staphylococcal bovine mastitis. Res Vet Sci. 2015;102:242–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mello CP, Santos SC. Taninos 4 ed In: Farmacognosia: da planta ao medicamento Porto Alegre: Editora Universitária/UFRGS/Ed da UFSC; 2002.Google Scholar
  12. Silva Júnior MCS. 100 Árvores do Cerrado: guia de campo. Brasília: Rede de Sementes do Cerrado; 2005. p. 278.Google Scholar
  13. Costa ES, Hiruma-Lima CA, Lima EO, Sucupira GC, Bertolin AO, Lolis SF, Andrade FDP, Vilegas W, Souza-Brito ARM. Antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants of the cerrado, Brazil. Phytother Res. 2008;22:705–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Saraiva AM, Saraiva CL, Cordeiro RP, Soares RR, Xavier HS, Caetano N. Atividade antimicrobiana e sinérgica das frações das folhas de Schinopsis brasiliensis Engl frente a clones multirresistentes de Staphylococcus aureus. Rev Bras Plants Medic. 2013;15:99–207.Google Scholar
  15. Chapaval L, Moon DH, Gomes JE, Duarte FR, Tsai SM. An alternative method for Staphylococcus aureus DNA isolation. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2008;60:299–306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M, editors. Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Chichester: Wiley; 1991. p. 115–75.Google Scholar
  17. Sanger F, Coulson AR. A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA by primed synthesis with DNA polymerase. J Mol Biol. 1975;94:441–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Reysenbach AL, Longnecker K, Kirshtein J. Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situ growth chamber deployed at a mid-atlantic ridge hydrothermal vent. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:3798–806.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. NCCLS. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Fifteenth Informational Supplement [Online] CLSI/NCCLS document M100-S15 [ISBN 1–56238–556-9] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087–1898 USA. 2005. Available: http://www.anvisagovbr/servicosaude/manuais/clsi/clsi_OPASM100S15.pdf [Accessed 10 May 2015].
  20. Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, JLM G, Sparovek G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Z. 2014;22:711–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Matos FJA. Introdução a Fitoquímica. UFC: Fortaleza; 2009. p. 150.Google Scholar
  22. Nyman U, Joshi P, Madsen LB, Pinstrup M, Rajasekharan S, George V, Pushpangadan P. Ethnomedical information and in vitro screening for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition of plants utilized as traditional medicines in Gujarat, Rajasthan and Kerala (India). J Ethnopharmacol. 1998;60:247–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hiermann A, Kartnig TH, Azzam S. Ein Beitrag zur quantitativen Bestimmung der Procyanidine in Crataegus. Sci Pharm. 1986;54:331–7.Google Scholar
  24. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Wayne: Twenty-First Informational Supplement CLSI document M100-S21Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2011.Google Scholar
  25. NCCLS. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically. Approved Standard—Sixth Edition [Online] NCCLS document M7-A6 [ISBN 1–56238–486-4] NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087–1898 USA, 2003. Available: (http://www.anvisagovbr/servicosaude/manuais/clsi/clsi_OPASM2-A8.pdf) [Accessed 10 May 2015].
  26. Klancnik A, Piskernik S, Jersek B, Mozina SS. Evaluation of diffusion and dilution methods to determine the antibacterial activity of plant extracts. J Microbiol Methods. 2010;81:121–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Malanovic N, Lohner K. Gram-positive bacterial cell envelopes: the impact on the activity of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1858:936–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Paula-Júnior W, Rocha FH, Donatti L, CMT F-p, Weffort-santos AM. Leishmanicidal, antibacterial, and antioxidant activities of Caryocar brasiliense Cambess leaves hydroEE. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2006;16:625–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Miranda-Vilela AL, Resck IS, Grisolia CK. Antigenotoxic activity and antioxidant properties of organic and aqueous extracts of pequi fruit (Caryocar brasiliense Camb) pulp. Genet Mol Biol. 2008;31:956–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lima MRF, Ximenes CPA, Luna JS, Sant’ana AEG. The antibiotic activity of some Brazilian medicinal plants. Braz Med Plants. 2006;16:300–6.Google Scholar
  31. Silva JJ, Cerdeira CD, Chavasco JM, Cintra ABP, Silva CBP, Mendonça AN, Ishikawa T, Boriollo MFG, Chavasco JK. In vitro screening antibacterial activity of Bedens pilosa Linné and Annona crassiflora Mart against oxacillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA) from the aerial environment at the dental clinic. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2014;56:333–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Pinho L, Souza PNS, Macedo Sobrinho E, Almeida AC, Martins ER. Atividade antimicrobiana de extratos hidroalcoolicos das folhas de alecrim-pimenta, aroeira, barbatimão, erva baleeira e do farelo da casca de pequi. Cienc Rural. 2012;42:326–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Amaral LFB, Moriel P, Foglio MA, Mazzola PG. Caryocar brasiliense supercritical CO2 extract possesses antimicrobial and antioxidant properties useful for personal care products. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;73:14–73.Google Scholar
  34. Scalbert A. Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry. 1991;30:3875–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Cushnie TPT, Lamb AJ. Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids. Int J Antimicrobial Agents. 2005;26:343–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Roesler R, Malta LG, Carrasco LC, Holanda RB, Souza CAS, Pastore GM. Atividade antioxidante de frutas do Cerrado. Cienc Tecnol Aliment. 2007;27:53–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Balouiri M, Sadik M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: a review. J Pharmt Anal. 2016;6:71–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement