Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk of bias for trials within different funding categories and overall

From: Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine

 

Risk of bias

Pharmaceutical funding/involvement (86 trials)

Non pharmaceutical funding declared (19 trials)

No funding source declared (21 trials)

All trials (126 trials)

Sequence generation

High

3 (3.5%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

3 (2.4%)

Low

16 (18.6%)

7 (36.8%)

8 (38.1%)

31 (24.6%)

Unclear

67 (77.9%)

12 (63.2%)

13 (61.9%)

92 (73.0%)

Allocation concealment

High

5 (5.8%)

1 (5.3%)

0 (0%)

6 (4.8%)

Low

5 (5.8%)

3 (15.8%)

3 (14.3%)

11 (8.7%)

Unclear

76 (88.4%)

15 (78.9%)

18 (85.7%)

109 (86.5%)

Blinding

High

5 (5.8%)

3 (15.8%)

2 (9.5%)

10 (7.9%)

Low

29 (33.7%)

7 (36.8%)

8 (38.1%)

44 (34.9%)

Unclear

52 (60.5%)

9 (47.4%)

11 (52.4%)

72 (57.1%)

Incomplete outcome reporting

High

14 (16.3%)

1 (5.3%)

4 (19.0%)

19 (15.1%)

Low

36 (41.9%)

15 (78.9%)

14 (66.7%)

65 (51.6%)

Unclear

36 (41.9%)

3 (15.8%)

3 (14.3%)

42 (33.3%)

Selective outcome reporting

High

18 (20.9%)

5 (26.3%)

6 (28.6%)

29 (23.0%)

Low

64 (74.4%)

11 (57.9%)

12 (57.1%)

87 (69.0%)

Unclear

4 (4.7%)

3 (15.8%)

3 (14.3%)

10 (7.9%)

  1. Data expressed as as raw numbers and percentages of total trials