Skip to main content

Table 6 Simple and multiple linear regression analysis to determine factors associated with change in lean mass

From: Assessing the adequacy of essential nutrient intake in obese dogs undergoing energy restriction for weight loss: a cohort study

Variable

R

R2

Probability

Simple regression

   

 Agea

−0.27

0.07

0.170

 Sex

0.09

0.01

0.658

 Neuter status

−0.14

0.02

0.471

 Duration of weight loss

0.057

0.00

0.781

 Percentage weight loss

−0.55

0.30

0.003

 Mean EI during weight lossb

0.28

0.08

0.152

 Mean rate of weight lossc

−0.33

0.11

0.092

 Starting percentage body fat

−0.28

0.08

0.152

 Change in fat massd

0.11

0.01

0.605

Mean daily intake < RDAe

   

 Methionine & Cysteine

−0.32

0.10

0.107

 Tryptophan

−0.21

0.05

0.282

 Choline

−0.13

0.02

0.514

Minimum daily intake < RDAf

   

 Methionine & Cysteine

−0.21

0.05

0.282

 Tryptophan

0.05

0.00

0.790

 Choline

−0.31

0.10

0.111

Final multiple regression model

   

 Percentage weight loss

−0.55

0.30

0.003

  1. All data are expressed as median (range). EI: energy intake; RDA: recommended daily allowance
  2. aAge at the start of the weight loss programme
  3. bMean energy intake expressed as metabolisable energy (in kJ [Kcal]) per kg of metabolic body weight (BW0.75) per day
  4. cMean rate of weight loss expressed as percentage of starting body weight per week
  5. dPercentage change in fat mass between the start and end of the weight loss period
  6. eDummy variable created whereby 1 = the mean daily intake of each nutrient less than the NRC 2006 RA, and 0 when it was greater [15]
  7. fDummy variable created whereby 1 was assigned when the minimum daily intake of the nutrient less than the NRC 2006 RA, and 0 was assigned when it was greater [15]