Skip to main content

Table 4 Bivariable analysis of categorical predictors for predicted calving rate in herds in three states of Northern Nigeria

From: Brucellosis, genital campylobacteriosis and other factors affecting calving rate of cattle in three states of Northern Nigeria

Predictor and level

No. tested

Calving rate (%)

P -value

Mean

SD

Brucella infectiona

   

<0.001

 No

59

76.8

9.2

 

 Yes

192

43.6

21.8

 

Campylobacter fetus infectiona

   

<0.001

 No

166

57.3

22.2

 

 Yes

66

33.1

18.0

 

Statea

   

0.033

 Adamawa

87

46.1

23.5

 

 Kaduna

98

55.2

22.8

 

 Kano

66

52.7

25.8

 

Method of breedinga

   

0.026

 AI and natural mating

44

52.5

24.0

 

 AI only

11

70.1

25.0

 

 Natural mating only

196

50.1

23.8

 

Use of AIa

   

0.11

 No

196

50.1

23.8

 

 Yes

55

56.0

25.0

 

Management systema

   

<0.001

 Zero-grazing

3

76.2

12.3

 

 Commercial

26

66.2

25.4

 

 Agro-pastoral

146

58.1

21.3

 

 Pastoral

76

32.6

17.3

 

Supplementary feedinga

   

<0.001

 None

25

21.9

7.6

 

 Fodder/bran

105

46.3

22.1

 

 Concentrate

121

62.0

21.5

 

Mineral supplementationa

   

<0.001

 No

69

32.2

17.6

 

 Yes

182

58.7

22.2

 

Pasture establishmenta

   

0.122

 No

187

50.0

23.8

 

 Yes

64

55.5

24.9

 

Water sourcea

   

<0.001

 Piped

69

63.2

21.2

 

 Natural flowing

112

46.6

22.5

 

 Natural static

70

47.6

25.8

 

Housinga

   

<0.001

 Open barbed wire

153

46.4

23.3

 

 Open half way and roofed

66

63.1

24.6

 

 Open solid enclosure

32

51.5

18.9

 

Hygiene/floor typea

   

<0.001

 Floored

63

63.1

23.0

 

 Unfloored/natural bear earth

188

47.5

23.3

 

Isolation and observation of the cow during parturition and removal of afterbirtha

   

<0.001

 No

94

35.1

19.1

 

 Yes

154

61.4

21.4

 

Regular herd prophylactic measuresa

   

<0.001

 No

97

40.0

22.1

 

 Yes

154

58.6

22.5

 

Borrow/share bulla

   

<0.001

 No

166

60.4

21.8

 

 Yes

85

33.9

18.2

 

Presence of small ruminantsa

   

<0.001

 No

97

65.6

19.5

 

 Yes

154

42.5

22.5

 

Presence of dogsa

   

0.036

 No

227

52.9

24.5

 

 Yes

24

37.5

13.7

 

Presence of chickensa

   

0.0002

 No

161

55.7

23.3

 

 Yes

90

43.8

23.9

 

Multiple herdsa

   

0.013

 No

166

54.1

23.6

 

 Yes

85

46.1

25.3

 

Purpose of keeping animalsa

   

0.0002

 Small scale local dairy

187

52.5

24.1

 

 Dairy and Beef

29

61.3

23.2

 

 Beef

35

37.5

18.9

 

Initial purchase of stock from a marketa

   

<0.001

 Inherited

118

55.1

24.0

 

 Other farms

14

71.5

21.2

 

 Market

119

45.4

27.7

 

Buying-in new animals and quarantinea

   

<0.001

 Buy <3 + quarantine

30

68.4

11.8

 

 Buy >3 or no quarantine

147

38.3

20.2

 

 Close herd

74

70.6

15.9

 

Socio-economic status of farmera

   

0.031

 Full-time

176

53.6

23.7

 

 Part-time

75

46.4

24.9

 

Specialist attending to animalsa

   

<0.001

 No

48

32.6

17.9

 

 Yes

203

55.9

23.3

 

Presence of crush/local chute or other means of handling/restrain at the farma

   

0.061

 No

187

49.8

23.9

 

 Yes

64

56.3

24.9

 
  1. aVariable significant (P < 0.20) for calving rate and therefore considered in the multivariable model.