- Research article
- Open Access
Prevalence of tuberculosis in pigs slaughtered at two abattoirs in Ethiopia and molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosisisolated from tuberculous-like lesions in pigs
© Arega et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 19 December 2012
- Accepted: 24 April 2013
- Published: 6 May 2013
Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious, granulomatous disease caused by acid-fast bacilli of the genus Mycobacterium. The disease affects practically all species of vertebrates. Although mammalian tuberculosis has been nearly controlled in many developed countries, it is still a serious problem in humans and domestic animals including pigs in developing countries. In Ethiopia, the prevalence of TB in pigs is not known. Therefore, this study was designed to estimate the prevalence of TB in pigs in central Ethiopia and to characterize the causative agents using molecular techniques.
The estimated prevalence of TB was 5.8% (49/841). Age and origin of pigs were significantly associated (P<0.001) with the prevalence. In contrast, an association of sex, floor type and water source with the prevalence could not be shown. Culture positivity was confirmed in 30.6% (15/49) of the tuberculous-like lesions. Of the 15 isolates, 12 were acid fast positive while five of the latter were confirmed by multiplex PCR as members of the M. tuberculosis complex. Speciation of the five isolates further confirmed that they were M. tuberculosis, belonging to SIT1088 (two isolates) and SIT1195 (one isolate). The remaining two isolates belong to an identical spoligotype, the pattern of which was not found in the spoligotype database (SpolDB4).
The isolation of M. tuberculosis from pigs suggests a possible risk of transmission between humans and pigs. Hence, establishing feasible control methods is required.
- Molecular typing
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- Post-mortem examination
Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious, granulomatous disease caused by acid-fast bacilli (AFB) of the genus Mycobacterium. The disease affects practically all species of vertebrates . The tubercle bacilli are Mycobacterium (M.) tuberculosis, the agent of the disease in primates, M. bovis in other mammals and M. avium in birds. Host specificity is relative .
Pigs are susceptible to all the three types of tubercle bacilli [1, 3]. It has been suggested that there is a correlation between the occurrence of TB in pigs and a direct or indirect contact of pigs with tuberculous humans, cattle or birds [4, 5]. The presence of TB in pigs in virtually all countries, in which pigs are farmed, has long been reported . In Ethiopia, a retrospective meat inspection data analysis report by Shitaye and co-workers  indicated a 0.009% prevalence of TB in pigs slaughtered in Addis Ababa abattoir in the years 1996–2005. This report is the only available information on tuberculosis in pigs in Ethiopia. The mycobacterial species involved were not isolated in the study.
The impact of tuberculosis in swine is complicated. Pig carcasses are condemned due to tuberculous lesions . Losses from test-and-slaughter of cattle for the control of bovine TB caused by dissemination of M. bovis by infected pigs [8, 9] and losses from destruction of false-positive reactors due to sensitization by mycobacteria species other than tuberculosis [10–12] may be indirect consequences of swine tuberculosis. On top of this, an increasing number of reports of several types of mycobacterial infections among HIV–infected and immunocompromised patients has blamed animals to be the source of infections to humans [13–15]. Studies have shown that pigs are among the possible sources of mycobacterial infections to humans and animals [9, 16, 17].
Although mammalian tuberculosis has been nearly controlled in humans and domestic animals in many developed countries, it is still a serious problem in developing countries including Ethiopia [18–20]. In Ethiopia, the epidemiology of tuberculosis is barely studied. Particularly in pigs, it is not known at all. The detection, isolation and characterization of the causative agents and investigation of risk factors associated with the disease are important steps in the control of TB. Therefore, this study was designed to estimate the prevalence of TB in pigs in central Ethiopia and to characterize the causative agents using molecular techniques.
The investigated specimens and epidemiological data from pigs were collected from two abattoirs located in Addis Ababa and Bishoftu. Both cities are located in the central part of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa is the capital and largest city of the country, while Bishoftu is a rapidly growing and industrializing town located 46 km south-east of Addis Ababa. Apart from Addis Ababa and Bishoftu pigs were brought for slaughter to these abattoirs from Special Oromia Zone, Adama and Modjo which are at most within 100km radius from Addis Ababa.
Sampling and post-mortemexamination
A total number of 841 pigs slaughtered from March to September 2011 were investigated. Detailed post-mortem examinations were conducted on all slaughtered pigs following the procedure described previously . Lymph nodes and suspected organs were incised into slices of approximately 2 mm thickness to facilitate the detection of lesions and inspected for the presence of TB lesions. Tissues from suspected TB lesions were collected into sterile universal bottles filled with 5 ml of 0.9% saline solution for mycobacterial culture. Then, they were transported in an ice box with ice packs until they reached to Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology (ALIPB) TB laboratory. In the laboratory samples were either processed in the following few days while kept at 4°C until the time of processing or kept refrigerated at −20°C for a maximum of 10 days for later processing.
Tissue preparation, culturing and identification of mycobacteria
Samples were further processed for isolation of mycobacteria in accordance with protocols of the World Organization for Animal Health . In the laboratory, tissue samples were dissected using sterile blades and manually homogenized using a mortar and pestle. This was followed by decontamination by shaking the homogenate in an equal volume of 4% NaOH for 10–15 minutes at room temperature and neutralized with 1% (0.1N) HCl using phenol red as an indicator. Neutralization was achieved when the colour of the solution turned from purple to yellow. The suspension was then centrifuged 3,000 ×g for 15 minutes, the supernatant discarded and sediment was used for AFB staining and culture.
The sediment was cultured onto each slant of two Lowenstein–Jensen (LJ) media one enriched with glycerol and the other with pyruvate. The slants were incubated aerobically at 37°C for a minimum of eight weeks or until macroscopic growth was observed while they were examined on a regular basis for macroscopic growth. Smears from visible growth were prepared for microscopic examination using the Ziehl–Neelsen staining technique to select AFB positive isolates.
Molecular characterization of mycobacterial isolates
Genus typing by Multiplex PCR
Ten AFB positive isolates were subjected to multiplex PCR identification test according to the technique described by Wilton and Cousins , which detects and differentiates M. tuberculosis complex (MTC) from M. avium complex (MAC), M. intracellularae and other mycobacterial species. Heat killed AFB positive samples were used as source of DNA template.
In brief, the PCR amplification reaction was performed in a Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems; PTC-100™) with 20 μl reaction mixture used for PCR reaction. This total volume consisted of 5 μl of genomic DNA as a template, 8 μl HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen, United Kingdom), 0.3 μl of each of the six different primers used for multiplex PCR and 5.2 μl Qiagen water. The primers for amplification were MYCGEN-F, 5’-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG-3’ (35 ng/μl); MYCGEN-R, 5’- TGC ACA CAG GCC ACA AGG GA-3’ (35 ng/μl); MYCAV-R, 5’-ACC AGA AGA CAT GCG TCT TG-3’ (35 ng/μl); MYCINT-F, 5’ CCT TTA GGC GCA TGA TGT CTT TA 3’ (75 ng/μl); TB1- F, 5’-GAA CAA TCC GGA GTT GAC AA-3’ (20 ng/μl); and TB-1- R, 5’-AGC ACG CTG TCA ATC ATG TA-3’ (20 ng/μl). M. tuberculosis strain (H37Rv) and M. avium were used as positive controls while Qiagen water served as a negative control. The reaction mixture was then heated to 95°C for 10 minutes. This was followed by 35 cycles of reaction consisting of 95°C for 1 minute for denaturation; 61°C for 0.5 minute for annealing; 72°C for 2 minutes for extension. Finally, the reaction mixture was maintained at 72°C for 10 minutes.
PCR products were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gel in 10× TAE running buffer. Ethidium bromide at ratio of 1:10, 100 bp DNA ladder (Promega Cooperation, USA), and Orange 6× loading dye were used in gel electrophoresis. The gel was visualized in a Multi–image™ light cabinet using Alpha Innotech version 184.108.40.206 (Alpha Innotech Corporation). All members of the genus Mycobacterium produce a band of 1030 bp and M. avium or subspecies such as M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis produce an extra band of 180 bp, M. intracellularae a band of 850 bp while a band of 372 bp can be amplified from members of the MTC.
RD4 Deletion typing
RD4 deletion typing was carried out on isolates that showed a band regarded as specific for the MTC by multiplex PCR. For this deletion typing, the procedure of Cadmus et al. was followed. Primers that were used include RD4 FlankF 5’-CTC GTC GAA GGC CAC TAA AG-3’, RD4 FlankR 5’-AAG GCG AAC AGA TTC AGC AT-3’, and RD4 Internal 5’-ACA CGC TGG CGA AGT ATA GC-3’ to check for the presence of the RD4 locus. The HotStarTaq Master Mix system from Qiagen was used for PCR with the primers described above. M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis were used as positive control while Qiagen water served as a negative control.
A reaction mixture consisting of 10 μl of HotStarTaq Master Mix, 0.3 μl each of the three primers (RD4 FlankR, RD4 FlankF and RD4 Internal), 2 μl DNA template and 7.1 μl H2O Qiagen adding up to a final volume of 20 μl was heated in a Thermal Cycler (Applied biosystem; PTC- 100™) to 95°C for 15 minutes. Then, the reaction underwent 35 cycles consisting of de-naturation at 95°C for 1 minute, annealing at 55°C for 1 minute and extension at 72°C for 1 minute. Finally the reaction mixture was maintained at 72°C for 10 minutes.
PCR products were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gel in 10× TAE running buffer with ethidium bromide at a ratio of 1:10. A 100 bp DNA ladder (Promega Cooperation, USA) and Orange 6× loading dye were also used for visual tracking of DNA migration during electrophoresis. The gel was visualized in similar way as described above. The presence of RD4 (M. tuberculosis, M. africanum) gives a product size of 335 bp (RD4 Internal+RD4 FlankR) and in its absence (M. bovis), a product of 446 bp (RD4 FlankR+RD4 FlankF) is amplified.
RD9 deletion typing
RD9 deletion typing was applied to isolates that showed the presence of RD4 region. For this deletion typing, a procedure described by Cadmus et al. was followed. The primers used for RD9 deletion typing were RD9 FlankF, 5’-AAC ACG GTC ACG TTG TCG TG-3’, RD9 FlankR, 5’-CAA ACC AGC AGC TGT CGT TG-3’ and RD9 Internal, 5’-TTG CTT CCC CGG TTC GTC TG-3’. The mixture was heated in a Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems; PTC- 100™) using an initial hot start of 95°C for 15 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 minute, 55°C for 2 minute, and 72°C for 1 minute; a final extension step of 72°C for 10 minutes to complete the cycle. Each PCR reaction tube contained 7.1 μl H2O Qiagen, 10 μl HotStarTaq Master Mix, 0.3 μl of each of the three primers (1.5 μM final concentration), 2 μl of DNA templates of samples or controls making the total volume 20 μl. M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis were used as positive controls while Qiagen water served as a negative control.
PCR product electrophoresis and visualization was performed by similar technique as described above. The presence of RD9 (i.e. M. tuberculosis) gives a product size of 396 bp (RD9 FlankF + RD9 Internal) and its absence (M. africanum, M. bovis) gives a product size of 575 bp (RD9 FlankF+RD9 FlankR).
Spoligotyping is a PCR-based technique, which exploits the variability of the direct repeat (DR) region, developed to simultaneously detect and type M. tuberculosis complex. Spoligotyping was performed as previously described by Kamerbeek et al. and according to the spoligotype kit supplier’s instructions (Ocimum Biosolutions Company, Ijsselstein, The Netherlands). The DR region was amplified by PCR using oligonucleotide primers (DRa: 5’ GGT TTT GGG TCT GAC GAC 3’ and DRb: 5’ CCG AGA GGG GAC GGA AAC 3’) derived from the DR sequence. The DRa is biotinylated at the 5’-end. A total volume of 25 μl of the following reaction mixture was used for the PCR: 12.5 μl of HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen: this solution provides a final concentration of 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 200 μM of each deoxynucleotides triphosphates), 2 μl of each primer (20 pmol each), 5 μl suspension of heat-killed cells (approximately 10 to 50 ng), and 3.5 μl distilled water.
The mixture was heated for 15 minutes at 96°C and then subjected to 30 cycles of 1 minute at 96°C, 1 minute at 55°C, and 30 seconds at 72°C. The amplified product was hybridized to a set of 43 immobilized oligonucleotides, each corresponding to one of the unique spacer DNA sequences within the DR locus. After hybridization, the membrane was washed twice for 10 minutes in 2× SSPE (1× SSPE is 0.18 M NaCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4, and 1 mM EDTA [pH 7.7])/0.5% sodium dodecyl sulphate at 60°C and then incubated in 1:4000 diluted streptavidin peroxidase (Boehringer) for 45 to 60 minutes at 42°C. The membrane was then washed twice for 10 minutes in 2× SSPE-0.5% sodium dodecyl sulphate at 42°C and rinsed with 2× SSPE for 5 minutes at room temperature. Hybridizing DNA was detected by the enhanced chemiluminescence method (Amersham) and by exposure to an X-ray film (Hyperfilm ECL, Amersham) as specified by the manufacturer.
Collected data were double-entered, classified, filtered and coded using Microsoft Excel® 2007 and analysed using the software package STATA 10.1 (StataCorp, Texas, USA). Univariate analysis was performed using the Chi-squared test. Logistic regression was then used to analyse risk factors that were found significantly associated in the univariate analysis with a cut-off P≤ 0.2. Effects were reported as statistically significant if the P value was less than 0.05.
A total of 841 pigs were inspected in two abattoirs where used for present study: more than 62% were from Addis Ababa Abattoir and 37% were in Bishoftu Abattoir. The majority (67%) of the pigs were less than one year of age. Pigs were brought for slaughter mainly from Bishoftu (60%) and Addis Ababa and the neighbouring Special Oromia Zone (30%). Eighty eight per cent of the pigs were fed commercial mixed feed, while only 12% fed on swill, poultry offal and litter in addition to grazing on pasture and/or roaming for garbage.
Prevalence of tuberculosis in pigs
Univariate analysis of potential risk factors associated with the presence of gross TB lesions in slaughter pigs
No. positive (%)
95% CI for positive
Adama and Mojo
Addis Ababa and Special Oromia Zone
Commercial mixed feed
Grazing plus swill, offal and/or roaming
Furthermore, the origin of the pigs was significantly associated with the prevalence (χ2 = 27.67; P< 0.001, Table 1). Pigs from Addis Ababa and the nearby Special Oromia Zone had the highest prevalence of 12.8%. Similarly, the prevalence was affected by the feeding practice (P<0.05) and location of the slaughterhouse (P<0.05). Pigs that were kept free grazing and fed with one or more of swill, poultry offal or left to roam for garbage had TB suggestive gross lesion/s more frequently than those fed on commercial mixed feed. In contrast, the variation in the prevalence between sex, floor type and water source was not statistically significant (P>0.05, Table 1).
Multivariate analysis of potential risk factors associated with the presence of gross TB lesions in slaughter pigs
95% CI for OR
≤ 1 year
Adama and Mojo
Addis Ababa and Special Oromia Zone
Gross TB-suggestive lesions and mycobacterial culture
Gross TB-suggestive lesions were collected from submandibular, mesenteric, mediastinal, and bronchial lymph nodes and from lung and liver tissues. Mycobacterial culture positivity on LJ media enriched with glycerol was observed in 30.6% (15/49) of the tissues examined. No growth was observed on LJ media enriched with pyruvate. Ten of these isolates were AFB positive on Ziehl–Neelsen staining. Generally lesions were more frequently detected in lymph nodes and tissues of digestive tract than that of the respiratory tract. The percentage of gross TB lesions was highest in submandibular lymph nodes (28%) and lowest in mediastinal lymph nodes (7%). Culture positivity was observed on samples from mesenteric (20%) and submandibular (40%) lymph nodes and the lungs (40%).
Molecular characterization of isolates
Identification of the genus Mycobacterium
Speciation of Mycobacterium tuberculosiscomplex isolates
The five MTC isolates were then subjected to RD4 deletion and RD9 deletion typing (picture not shown) using the primers indicated in the methods section. A PCR product sizes of 335 bp (for RD4) and 396 bp (for RD9) were observed in all the isolates and thus confirming that they are M. tuberculosis.
Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosisisolates
In the present study, the occurrence of TB was investigated in slaughter pigs in two abattoirs from Addis Ababa and Bishoftu. Although the pig industry is growing in recent years and many piggeries are being established in many parts of the country public slaughtering is carried out only in Addis Ababa Abattoirs Enterprise slaughterhouse. The meat inspection activity is under close supervision by the federal ministry of agriculture where every carcass is inspected by recognized meat inspector. The slaughterhouse in Bishoftu is part of a private swine farm where small numbers of pigs are slaughtered. Carcass is not inspected by meat inspectors in this slaughterhouse. In addition to these two abattoirs are several backyard slaughters in many of small scale swine production systems which are favoured by increasing demand for pork by foreigners particularly by Chinese people dwelling in this regions.
This study is the first of its kind in Ethiopia to investigate the molecular epidemiology of TB in pigs. Post-mortem and bacteriological examinations as well as molecular typing were applied. The estimated prevalence of TB was approximately 6%, and is was lower than prevalence estimates reported from other African countries including Cameroon , Egypt  and Uganda . On the other hand, it is higher than those reported from developed countries including New Zealand , The Netherlands , Czech Republic  and USA . Such differences in the prevalence of TB in pigs between developing and developed countries could be associated with the eradication of TB in human and cattle in the developed world, where cattle served as sources of infection to pigs [30, 31].
A significant association was detected among the age classes and the prevalence of TB lesion in pigs. Tuberculous lesions occurred more frequently in older pigs than younger pigs, which may be due to chronic nature of the disease, which requires a longer time to produce detectable lesions, and due to a longer period of exposure in older pigs. This findings is consistent with reports from other countries and in other species of animals [29, 32, 33].
Pigs that were kept on free grazing and fed with swill, offal or left to roam for garbage were found to harbour mycobacterial infections twice more frequently than those fed on commercial mixed feed, although the difference was not found to be significant. Outbreaks of M. tuberculosis in pigs which have been associated with the feeding of uncooked garbage from hospitals or residences housing human cases have been reported .
A higher estimated prevalence was recorded in pigs from Addis Ababa and Special Oromia Zone as compared to those slaughtered at Bishoftu. This variation could be a reflection of the husbandry system in that pigs are reared in Addis Ababa and the nearby Special Oromia Zone, where animals are kept under poor husbandry practices such as feeding swill, poultry litter, abattoir offal and garbage; sheltering with other domestic animals and confinement in poor housing system and where they have close contact with other animals and humans. In Ethiopia, the traditional small scale system, which is the predominant pig production system particularly in Addis Ababa and its nearby Special Oromia Zone, is characterised by absence or minimal health care, supplementary feeding and proper housing. It has been reported that the pig production is aggregated in the central part of the country , which could also promote the transmission of mycobacterial infections among the different farms through the movement of pigs from one farm to another particularly during establishment of new farms.
Lesions suggestive of TB were observed in the lungs, liver, head and were associated with mesenteric lymph nodes. Lesions appeared more frequently in the head, the mesenteric lymph nodes and in the liver. The presence of tuberculous lesions in the liver, the lymph nodes of the head and mesenteries may indicate infection by ingestion of contaminated feed, offal or infection from scavenging on contaminated garbage [30, 32], while lesions in the lung and its associated lymph nodes suggest airborne transmission . The observation of a higher proportion (>65%) of lesions in the lymph nodes of the head and gastrointestinal organs suggests ingestion to be the most common route of transmission in pigs. Similar observations were previously reported from Uganda [29, 30]. However, this cannot exclude airborne transmission in pigs.
Only about 31% of the lesions yielded mycobacterial growth in culture. Lower rate of mycobacterial growth from tissues with gross TB lesions have been reported from Czech Republic , Egypt , Uganda  and many other countries . Failure to demonstrate tubercle bacilli may be due to the occurrence of healed processes that contain no longer viable tubercle bacilli, or to microorganisms other than tubercle bacilli causing the lesions, such as Rhodococcus equi or R. sputi or inadequacy of the methods used for isolating tubercle bacilli [30, 32]. It could also be due to subjective differences in identifying tuberculous lesions . Nevertheless, culturing tubercle bacilli from such lesions needs further investigation so as to enable a maximum yield of viable organisms from culture for a correct interpretation of the results and thereby to appropriately explain the magnitude of the disease.
Isolation of M. tuberculosis, which is a predominant agent of tuberculosis in humans , from pigs suggests transmission between human and pigs, which could occur as a result of close contact between the two species , feeding of undercooked garbage or by sputum or body secretions from infected individuals . The isolation of M. tuberculosis in the lung and its associated lymph nodes further supports the idea proposed by Parra and co-workers  that swine are not dead end hosts for mammalian tuberculosis. Previous studies suggested interspecies transmission of mycobacteria in Ethiopia [19, 20, 37–40]. Similar findings were also reported from other countries where the burden of TB in humans and animals is high and where transmission between these two is likely to occur on a regular basis [3, 41]. Nonetheless, most reports from developed countries showed that lesions of TB in swine are due to members of the MAC [17, 30, 42–44]. In view of the fact that such reports are from countries, where there is an on-going mammalian TB control program, this difference may be due to the control of TB achieved by these countries .
Early in the 20th century, when TB in cattle and humans was more prevalent, TB in swine was either due to M. bovis or M. tuberculosis. However, for example in the USA the avian type TB began to occur more frequently in swine by 1925. Today, isolation of mycobacteria other than M. avium from swine is uncommon in the USA. In rare cases, it occurs in pigs which are kept on the same premises with M. bovis infected cattle or which have been in close contact with M. tuberculosis infected humans . After the enforcement of strict regulations for a test-and-slaughter policy, the prevalence of bovine type of TB in swine gradually declined concurrently with the eradication of the disease in cattle in most western countries [17, 30, 31].
In this study, one of the AFB positive isolates had a PCR product size indicative for the Genus Mycobacterium but none for MTC or MAC upon genus typing using multiplex PCR. The isolate was hence assumed to be a member of the mycobacteria other than tuberculosis (MOTT). Isolation of MOTT from swine has previously been reported from other countries [3, 4]. In Ethiopia, MOTT have been isolated from cattle  and camels  with tuberculous-like lesions, which indicates their involvement in a broad range of animal species  and their role as a cause of tuberculosis.
The two isolates in one of the clusters with identified SIT1088 have been detected in Egypt , India, South Africa and Portugal, while the other single isolate identified as SIT1995 has been reported from India . In Ethiopia, several studies recently reported new strains of M. tuberculosis[20, 33, 40, 47].
The isolation of M. tuberculosis from pigs suggests a possible risk of interspecies transmission particularly between pigs and humans. With this suggestion in mind, and with the expected rapid expansion of swine production within a couple of decades, it is likely that swine may play a role in increasing the incidence of TB in the country. Hence, establishing feasible control methods is recommended.
The authors thank: Addis Ababa University and Freie Universität Berlin for their support throughout the study period, Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology for the provision of laboratory facilities and reagents and its laboratory personnel for their cooperation during the lab work. The African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States - European Union (ACP-EU) Cooperation Programme in Higher Education (EDULINK) and the Ministry of Agriculture, Ethiopia funded the study. The University of Gondar financially supported the first author during the study period. Authors would also like to thank Addis Ababa Abattoirs Enterprise and Alema Swine Farm.
- Thoen CO: Tuberculosis and other mycobacterial infections. In The Merck veterinary manual. 9th edition. Edited by Kahn CM, Line S. New Jersey:Merck & Co., Inc; 2005:549–553.Google Scholar
- Saviola B, Bishai W: The genus Mycobacterium — Medical. The prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria. Volume 3.3rd edition. Edited by: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E.New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC; 2006: 919-933.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohamed AM, El-Ella GAA, Nasr EA: Phenotypic and molecular typing of tuberculous and nontuberculous Mycobacterium species from slaughtered pigs in Egypt. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009, 21: 48-52. 10.1177/104063870902100107.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nuttall WO: Tuberculosis of pigs. Surveillance. 1986, 13 (1): 2-4.Google Scholar
- Pavlik I: Control and eradication of bovine tuberculosis in central Europe. Mycobacterium bovis infection in animals and humans.2nd edition. Edited by: Thoen CO, Steele JH, Gilsdorf MJ.Iowa: Blackwell Publishing; 2006: 136-148.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shitaye JE, Getahun B, Alemayehu T, Skoric M, Treml F, Fictum P, Vrbas V, Pavlik I: A prevalence study of bovine tuberculosis by using abattoir meat inspection and tuberculin skin testing data, histopathological and IS6110 PCR examination of tissues with tuberculous lesions in cattle in Ethiopia. Vet Med. 2006, 51 (11): 512-522.Google Scholar
- Windsor RS, Duttant DS, Burn KJ: Avian tuberculosis in pigs: Mycobacterium intracellulare infection in a breeding herd. Vet Rec. 1984, 114: 497-500. 10.1136/vr.114.20.497.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Machackova M, Matlova L, Lamka J, Lekarstvi VUV, Brno Smolik J, Melicharek I, Hanzlikova M, Docekal J, Cvetnic Z, Nagy G, Lipiec M, Ocepek M, Pavlik I: Wild boar (Sus scrofa) as a possible vector of mycobacterial infections: review of literature and critical analysis of data from Central Europe between 1983 to 2001. Vet Med Czech. 2003, 48: 51-65.Google Scholar
- Phillips CJ, Foster CR, Morris PA, Teverson R: The transmission of Mycobacterium bovis infection to cattle. Res Vet Sci. 2003, 74: 1-15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pollock JM, Girvin RM, Lightbody KA, Neill SD, Clements RA, Buddle BM, Anderson P: Assessment of defined antigens for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in skin test-reactor cattle. Vet Rec. 2000, 146: 659-665. 10.1136/vr.146.23.659.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matlova L, Dvorska L, Ayele WY, Bartos M, Amemori T, Pavlik I: Distribution of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates in tissue samples of pigs fed peat naturally contaminated with mycobacteria as a supplement. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 1261-1286. 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1261-1268.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pavlik I, Matlova L, Dvorska L, Shitaye JE, Parmova I: Mycobacterial infections in cattle and pigs caused by Mycobacterium avium complex members and atypical mycobacteria in the Czech Republic during 2000–2004. Vet Med Czech. 2005, 50: 281-290.Google Scholar
- LoBue PA, Peter C, Tracy M, Moser K: Concurrent Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis infections in a patient with AIDS. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001, 5: 1164-1165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Srikantiah P, Charlebois E, Havlir DV: Rapid increase in tuberculosis incidence soon after infection with HIV—a new twist in the twin epidemics. J Infect Dis. 2005, 191: 147-149. 10.1086/426832.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chaisson RE, Martinson NA: Tuberculosis in Africa–combating an HIV-driven crisis. N Engl J Med. 2008, 358: 1089-1092. 10.1056/NEJMp0800809.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bono M, Jemmi T, Bernasconi C, Burki D, Telenti A, Bodmer T: Genotypic characterisation of Mycobacterium avium strains recovered from animals and their comparison to human strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995, 61: 371-373.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Komijn RE, De Haas PEW, Schnider MME, Eger T, Nieuwenhuijs JHM, Van Den Hoek RJ, Bakker D, Van Zijd Erveld FG, Van Soolingen D: Prevalence of Mycobacterium avium in slaughter pigs in the Netherlands and comparison of IS1245 restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns of porcine and human isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 1254-1259.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mathema B, Kurepina NE, Bifani PJ, Kreiswirth BN: Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis: current insights. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006, 19 (4): 658-685. 10.1128/CMR.00061-05.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shitaye JE, Tsegaye W, Pavlik I: Bovine tuberculosis infection in animal and human populations in Ethiopia: a review. Vet Med. 2007, 52 (8): 317-332.Google Scholar
- Berg S, Firdesa R, Habtamu M, Gadisa E, Mengistu A, Yamuah L, Ameni G, Vordermeier M, Roberson BD, Smith NH, Engers H, Young D, Hewinson RG, Aseffa A, Gordon SV: The burden of mycobacterial disease in Ethiopian cattle: implications for public health. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (4): 1-7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005361.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gracy JF: Meat hygiene. 8th edition. London: Bailliere-Tindall; 1986:350–360.Google Scholar
- OIE: Bovine tuberculosis. In Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. Volume 2, part 2, section 2.4. Chapter 2.4.7. World Organization for Animal Health; 2009.Google Scholar
- Wilton S, Cousins D: Detection and identification of multiple mycobacterial pathogens by DNA amplification in a single tube. PCR Methods Appl. 1992, 1: 269-273. 10.1101/gr.1.4.269.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cadmus S, Palmer S, Okker M, Dale J, Gover K, Smith N, Jahans K, Hewinson RG, Gordon SV: Molecular analysis of human and bovine tubercle bacilli from a local setting in Nigeria. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 29-34. 10.1128/JCM.44.1.29-34.2006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, van Embden J: Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 907-914.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brudey K, Driscoll JR, Rigouts L, Prodinger WM, Gori A, Al-Hajoj SA, Allix C, Aristimuño L, Arora J, Baumanis V, Binder L, Cafrune P, Cataldi A, Cheong S, Diel R, Ellermeier C, Evans JT, Fauville-Dufaux M, Ferdinand S, de Viedma DG, Garzelli C, Gazzola L, Gomes HM, Guttierez MC, Hawkey PM, van Helden PD, Kadival GV, Kreiswirth BN, Kremer K, Kubin M: Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genetic diversity: mining the fourth international spoligotyping database (SpolDB4) for classification, population genetics and epidemiology. BMC Microbiol. 2006, 6 (23): 1-17.Google Scholar
- SITVIT WEB. http://www.pasteur-guadeloupe.fr:8081/SITVIT_ONLINE/tools.jsp.
- Awa DN, Njoya AC, Tama N, Ekue FN: Diseases in north Cameroon: the health status of pigs in north Cameroon. http://pigtrop.cirad.fr/subjects/animal_health/diseases_in_north_cameroon.
- Muwonge A, Kankya C, Godfroid J, Djonne B, Opuda-Asibo J, Biffa D, Ayanaw T, Munyeme M, Skjerve E: Prevalence and associated risk factors of mycobacterial infections in slaughter pigs from Mubende district in Uganda. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010, 42: 905-913. 10.1007/s11250-009-9506-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thoen CO: Tuberculosis. In Diseases of swine. 9th edition. Edited by Straw BE,Zimmerman JJ, D’Allaire S, Taylor DJ. Iowa: Blackwell Publishing; 2006:807–816.Google Scholar
- Caffery JP: Studies of bovine tuberculosis eradication programmes in Europe. Vet Microbiol. 1994, 40: 1-4. 10.1016/0378-1135(94)90041-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchelift KW, Constable PD: Disease caused by bacteria – Mycobacteria In Veterinary medicine: a text book of the diseases of cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and horses. 10th edition. Edinburgh: Saunders,Elsevier; 2006:1007–1016.Google Scholar
- Mamo G, Bayleyegn G, Tessema TS, Legesse M, Medhin G, Bjune G, Abebe F, Ameni G: Pathology of camel tuberculosis and molecular characterization of its causative agents in pastoral regions of Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2011, 6: 158-162.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abdu S, Gashaw A: Production system dynamism and parasitic interaction of swine in and around Holetta. Ethiopia. Ethiop. Vet. J. 2010, 14 (1): 71-81.Google Scholar
- Menzies FD, Neill SD: Cattle-to-cattle transmission of bovine tuberculosis: review. Vet J. 2000, 160: 92-106.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parra A, Fernández-Llario P, Tato A, Larrasa J, Garcia A, Alonso JM, de Mendoza MH, de Mendoza MJ: Epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections of pigs and wild boars using a molecular approach. Vet Microbiol. 2003, 97: 123-133. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.08.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ameni G, Aseffa A, Engers H, Young D, Gordon S, Hewinson G, Vordermeier M: High prevalence and increased severity of pathology of bovine tuberculosis in Holsteins compared to Zebu breeds under field cattle husbandry in central Ethiopia. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007, 14 (10): 1356-1361. 10.1128/CVI.00205-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ameni G, Erkihun A: Bovine tuberculosis on small-scale dairy farms in Adama town, central Ethiopia, and farmer awareness of the disease. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 2007, 26 (3): 711-719.Google Scholar
- Demelash B, Inangolet F, Oloya J, Asseged B, Bedaso M, Yilkal A, Skjerve E: Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in Ethiopian slaughter cattle based on post-mortem examination. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009, 41: 755-765. 10.1007/s11250-008-9248-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ameni G, Desta F, Firdessa R: Molecular typing of Mycobacterium bovis isolated from tuberculosis lesions of cattle in north eastern Ethiopia. Vet Rec. 2010, 167: 138-141. 10.1136/vr.b4881.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sulieman MS, Hamid ME: Identification of acid fast bacteria from caseous lesions in cattle in Sudan. J. Vet. Med. 2002, 49: 415-418.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Payeur JB, Songer JG: Mycobacteriosis (Tuberculosis) in Swine. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University. Cooperative Extension Service. http://www.animalgenome.org/edu/PIH/99.html.
- Pate M, Zdovc I, Pirš T, Krt B, Ocepek M: Isolation and characterisation of Mycobacterium avium and Rhodococcus equi from granulomatous lesions of swine lymph nodes in Slovenia. Acta Vet Hung. 2004, 52 (2): 143-150. 10.1556/AVet.52.2004.2.2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cvetnić Ž, Špičić S, Duvnjak S, Zdelar-Tuk M, Benić M, Mitak M, Pate M, Krt B, Ocepek M: High prevalence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis in a batch of quarantined pigs in Croatia. Slov Vet Res. 2009, 46 (4): 149-154.Google Scholar
- Phillips MS, von Reyn CF: Nosocomial infections due to nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 33 (8): 1363-1374. 10.1086/323126.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Helal ZH, Ashour MSE, Eissa SA, Abd-Elatef G, Zozio T, Babapoor S, Rastogi N, Khan IM: Unexpectedly high proportion of ancestral manu genotype Mycobacterium tuberculosis stains cultured from tuberculosis patients in Egypt. J. Clin. Microbio. 2009, 47 (9): 2794-2801. 10.1128/JCM.00360-09.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agonafir M, Lemma E, Wolde-Meskel D, Goshu S, Santhanam A, Girmachew F, Demissie D, Getahun M, Gebeyehu M, van Soolingen D: Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Ethiopia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010, 14 (10): 1259-1265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.