- Research article
- Open Access
Computed tomographic and radiographic examination of dental structures in South American camelid specimen of different ages
- Abdolrazagh Rostami†1, 2,
- Urs Geissbühler†1,
- Frank Schellenberger3 and
- Patrik Zanolari†4Email author
© Rostami et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 8 March 2013
- Accepted: 31 December 2013
- Published: 6 January 2014
Tooth root problems and periodontal diseases are common in South American camelids (SAC). The objective was to evaluate and optimize the imaging technique for dental radiography in SAC and to describe the radiographic and computed tomographic (CT) anatomy of normal teeth at different ages. In this study, the heads of 20 healthy SAC slaughtered for meat production or euthanized for reasons not related to dental problems included 7 female and 10 male llamas and 3 male alpacas. Using a standardized protocol, radiographs and CT scans of the 20 specimen were performed.
The most useful radiographic projections for mandibular and maxillary cheek teeth evaluation turned out to be lateral30°ventral - laterodorsal and lateral30°dorsal - lateroventral with slight separation of the dental arcades respectively. Digital radiographic and CT appearance of the mandibular and maxillary teeth were described from the beginning of mineralization till maturity. In addition the normal range of the CT radio density of different cheek teeth and different dental tissues were measured. Hounsfield units of different dental tissues of SAC turned out to be similar to equids.
Deviation, shortening and partial destruction of the distal tooth root of mandibular 09′s and 10′s and of maxillary 09′s was observed and the existence of a common pulp chamber in younger teeth was revealed.
The present study provides information about the dental imaging morphology in clinically healthy SAC. This basic information provides fundamental knowledge for evaluating images and planning treatments in clinically affected animals.
Root problems and periodontal diseases are common in South American camelids (SAC) [1–3]. Malocclusion [3, 4], periodontal abscess, infection of the cheek teeth [2, 3, 5, 6], alveolar periosteitis or osteitis , and oral neoplasia  are various manifestations of dental problems in SAC of all ages. As in other species, radiography is a useful method of providing diagnostic information .
Computed tomographic (CT) images of the skull are superior to radiographs due to the higher contrast resolution, the lack of superimposition and the possibility of multiplanar and three dimensional (3D) reconstructions. Therefore, CT images may reveal bone and tooth abnormalities earlier than radiography. Diagnoses based on CT imaging allow a more accurate prognosis and therapeutic plan .
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and optimize the imaging technique for dental radiography in SAC and to describe the radiographic and CT anatomy of normal teeth at different ages.
Used specimens related to their species, gender and age
Diagnostic imaging technique and image evaluation
Description of the projections
Both mandibles positioned on the plate, hard palate parallel to the table, vertical beam
Cross point of midline and line between two MOCs*
Sagittal plane of the head parallel to the plate, horizontal beam
Half distance between ear base and lateral nostril angle on the facial crest
Left to right lateral30°dorsal-lateroventral oblique
Imaging plate parallel to the sagittal plane of the head
Half distance between ear base and lateral nostril angle on the line parallel to nasal margin which goes through lateral nostril angle
Left to right lateral30°ventral-laterodorsal oblique
Imaging plate parallel to the sagittal plane of the head
Half distance between ear base and lateral nostril angle on the rim of the corpus mandibulae
Intraoral VD of lower jaw
Intraoral plate, vertical beam
In the midline at the caudal aspect of the symphysis mandibulae
Statistical analysis was performed by use of commercially available softwareg. For all measurements, the mean and standard deviations were calculated.
Incisors and canines
The mandibular incisors were best visualized in the intraoral VD projection. The third incisor (03) of each hemi-mandible was subjectively narrower than the first (01). The deciduous incisors of both, alpacas and llamas were spatula-shaped. The permanent incisors of the llamas were still spatula-shaped with tapered roots, whereas the permanent incisors of alpacas were rectangular in cross section and chisel-shaped.
There was one incisor (03) and one canine tooth (04) in the maxillary arcade of each side. These two teeth were curved and sharp at both ends with a round cross-sectional structure. The crowns were completely covered with enamel.
Dental development and morphology of cheek teeth
South American camelids had cheek teeth with a typical hypsodontal structure. Their enamel folds made typical palisade-like segments, here called columns, in both the crown and reserve crown region. These columns had one rostrocaudal pulp horn segment, which, together with infundibular invagination, created a typical selenodont occlusal surface.
Each separate molar column contained two pulp horns, except the distal column of the third mandibular molar (11). Here, the pulp was not divided and had only one horn. All molars had 4 pulp horns and mandibular 11′s had 5 pulp horns. These pulp horns tended to be narrower toward the occlusal surface. In younger teeth of SAC a common pulp chamber was clearly visible. During the aging process of the tooth, secondary dentine is built up. This reduces the overall pulp cavity size and closes the common pulp chamber. Interpulpar communications between the pulp horns of the respective column were not detected with our CT-examination technique. The pulp cavities had soft tissue opacity.
The enamel folded around the pulp horns and was invaginated between the two pulp horns of the same column, producing an infundibulum in every molar column except for the distal column of mandibular 11′s which had no infundibulum. So there were two infundibula in each molar. In cross section, these infundibula had a crescent shape of which the convex aspect in mandibular teeth was located buccally and in maxillary teeth palatinally. The infundibula were filled with cementum and stretched to the occlusal surface of the teeth. No signs of infundibular lesions, but occlusal exposure and filling of infundibula with food debris were detected with age.
Mandibular cheek teeth
The mandibular 08 was present in all specimens. The mandibular deciduous 08 had three columns and just two divergent roots. The two mesial columns shared one root. The mandibular permanent 08 had two columns and two roots and was triangular in shape. The mandibular premolars had no infundibulum (Figures 5A, 5B).
The mandibular 09 and 10 were made up of two separate columns which were attached together in crown and each was anchored in alveolar bone with a separate single root (Figures 5A, 5B). The 10′s were larger than 09′s (Figures 5C, 5D).
The columns of 09, 10 and two mesial columns of 11 had a rectangular shape in cross section, with a dome shaped cap attached to their buccal aspect. In the cross sectional images, the entire mandibular dental arcade formed a straight line with enamel invaginations between the columns in the lingual aspect and a palisade like surface with vaults in the buccal aspect. The mesial columns of 10′s and 11′s had an additional enamel fold which was tightly attached to the mesio-buccal border of the teeth and was more pronounced in 11′s. In lateral projection the occlusal surface of the teeth was serrated and had sharp enamel crests. No interdental space was present at the level of the occlusal surface of the cheek teeth and they were in tight contact, making one entire grinding surface in each arcade.
The 11′s had three columns and each column had its own single root (Figures 5I, 5J). These roots were apparently shorter than the roots of other cheek teeth in comparison to their crown (Figure 5). The third column of 11′s, located at the distal aspect, was smaller than the other columns and had an oval shape in cross section. It has no infundibulum and only one pulp horn The roots and columns were located side by side in the same plane.
A similar deviation was detected in the distal root of 10′s in 3 cases (15%), but the distance between the distal root of 10′s and the mesial root of 11′s was larger and deformities were less frequent compared to the aforementioned dental roots.
Maxillary cheek teeth
The fourth premolar (08) had a rectangular shape in sagittal section. It consisted of one column and one or two palatal and two buccal roots. Each root contained one root canal and the two root canals of the buccal roots were fused to one buccal pulp horn. The enamel folding formed one infundibulum in this tooth. The roots of this tooth lay ventrally to the infraorbital foramen (Figures 7C, 7D).
All three maxillary molars varied in size: the 10′s were the largest teeth in this arcade and had rectangular shape and structure. All molars had two columns, four roots and two infundibula. Every column had a palatal and a buccal root, which were superimposed on radiographs. The infundibular funnels expanded toward the distal columns. The distal column of the third molar (11) had the widest infundibular funnel. These funnels were crescent shaped in cross section and located between the palatal and buccal pulp horns, the convex aspect showing to the palatal side.
The maxillary cheek teeth were rectangular in shape (except for 07′s which was oval on cross section) with a lingually located dome-shaped aspect in contrast to the lower jaw in which the vaults were buccal. Although the teeth were located side by side in the same plane, the roots deviated from this plane. They usually got longer with age, but in general there was no deviation toward other roots like in the lower jaw with the exception of 7 cases (35%), where there was contact between the apical end of the disto-buccal root of 09 and the mesio-buccal root of 10 (in analogy to Figures 6E, 6F).
Radiodensity of permanent cheek teeth
Radiodensity of dental tissues in deciduous cheek teeth
This study was designed to assess the dental structures of SAC using CT, to compare these findings with radiographic findings and to determine a clinically useful radiographic examination protocol for a thorough dental examination. No data was available on this topic in the literature. CT imaging data in cases of disease and on the normal nondental structures of the skull of SAC do, however, exist [1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 12]. On the basis of the CT images, the best angulations for oblique radiographic projections can now be recommended and are lateral30°dorsal - lateroventral and lateral30°ventral - laterodorsal respectively for maxillary and mandibular arcades, which provides the least distortion of the reserve crown and tooth roots and the least superimposition of the dental arcades. This result differs from the recommendations of Niehaus where angle of 45° oblique projections was used . In contrast to the study of Niehaus, the goniometer of the X- ray machine was used for determining the incident angle, which seems to be more reliable. As the images in this study have been produced from specimens, Figure 1 show the recommended radiographic technique on live animals based on the actual results.
In the early stages of development of cheek teeth, even with some degree of mineralization in the tooth bud, it was not possible to distinguish the dental sac in the alveolar bone by radiography. However, CT images provided clear visualization of these structures. The dental sacs of 2 to 4 year- old horses have been described . The data of the present study are consistent with those of other studies on horses . As in horses, the buds of the permanent unerupted teeth contained a developing enamel crown. At this stage, these teeth lack tooth root development and have wide pulps and open root apices. After complete eruption, the morphology of the teeth did not change with age and wear of the cheek teeth and enamel overgrowths did not develop as occurred in horses [3, 10, 14].
Some authors have speculated that premature removal of deciduous caps shortly after eruption can be a potential etiology for dental problems [1, 2, 6]. As the dental problems in SAC are more frequently seen in mandibular molars [1, 2] at the age of 4 to 8 years [2, 6] - according to our findings - another possible explanation for this might be that the roots of mandibular cheek teeth were deviated, deformed or shortened and partially destroyed with different degrees of pulp exposure. This fact might explain why the onset of the disease occurs at a wide range of age. These deformities were detected most frequently in mandibular 09′s and with a lower frequency in mandibular 08′s and 10′s, where the dental problems were also most frequently reported to occur [1, 2]. In the maxillary arcades, there may be some degree of contact between the roots at the apex. This deviation was commonly detected between the disto-buccal root of the first molar (09) and the mesio-buccal root of second molar (10). Sclerosis of alveolar bone and tooth root deformities were not clearly visualized as in mandibular tooth roots. However, considering the rather small sample size and the lack of animals at specific age categories (median age of the animals was 3 years and 3 months ranging from 9 months to 9 years), caution must be applied, as the findings might not be fully representative for the entire population of SAC.
The fact that the pulp horns in the mesial and distal tooth roots of cheek teeth in SAC do not communicate is reported [1, 2]. This statement requires a detailed explanation. As teeth age in healthy SAC, secondary dentine closes the common pulp chamber. The precise moment at which this closure occurs in both healthy and diseased teeth, cannot be determined from our results and requires further investigation. However, we found that a common pulp chamber definitely existed in the younger teeth of SAC. This may be an indicator for surgical intervention.
Concerning the mandibular incisors there was a clear morphological difference between alpacas and llamas as was also published by other authors . Concerning the ongoing eruption process during maturity, further investigations need to be done to understand this better.
There are similarities between the density ranges for dental areas in SAC expressed by Hounsfield Units in this study and those described previously for horses [15, 16]. In contrast to the radiopacity in radiographs, the density expressed in Hounsfield units allows an objective comparison between healthy and altered dental tissues in SAC as well as in horses. Furthermore, this value might help to recognize dental tissues for example in aggressive bone lesions of the upper and lower jaw in SAC. The information of CT-findings provides greater detail in the evaluation of dental structures than radiographs. The superimposition of bony and dental structures, especially tooth roots of the maxillary cheek teeth, in radiographic projections does not permit accurate examination, while CT images allow improved identification of the shape and size of different dental structures and their variation and of potential pathologies.
Consent was obtained from the owners of the SAC for publication of this study and any accompanying images.
The present study provides detailed information about the dental imaging morphology in clinically healthy SAC. This provides fundamental knowledge for evaluating images and treatment planning in SAC with dental disease. Future investigations are warranted to test the hypothesis that tooth root deformities, concurrent alveolar sclerosis and interdental tooth root contact might represent predisposing factors for dental disease in SAC.
aPhilips Brilliance, Royal Philips Electronics, Netherlands
bSiemens Optitop, Siemens Corporation, USA
cFuji FCR 5000, FUJIFILM Corporation, Japan
dFuji IP cassette type CC, FUJIFILM Corporation, Japan
eFuji IP cassette 3A, FUJIFILM Corporation, Japan
gExcel 2007, Microsoft Incorporation
The authors thank the owners of the South American camelids, providing specimens for this study for their constructive collaboration. The authors also thank Alexandra Siegrist for supplying the Figure 1, and Lesley Mumford for careful reading of the manuscript. The Iranian Ministry of Science, Research and Technology generously provided a fellowship for the first author.
- Niehaus AJ, Anderson DE: Tooth root abscesses in llamas and alpacas: 123 cases (1994–2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007, 231: 284-289. 10.2460/javma.231.2.284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niehaus AJ: Dental disease in llamas and alpacas. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2009, 25: 281-293. 10.1016/j.cvfa.2009.03.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fowler ME: Digestive System. Medicine and surgery of camelids. 3rd edition. Edited by: Fowler ME. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Publishing;2010:351-363.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McConnell T, Hoffman E: On-farm assessment and diagnosis. The Complete Alpaca Book.2nd edition. Edited by: Hoffman E. Santa Cruz, California: Bonny Doon Press; 2006:420-422.Google Scholar
- O’Brien RT: Intraoral dental radiography: experimental study and clinical use in two horses and a llama. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1996, 37: 412-416. 10.1111/j.1740-8261.1996.tb01251.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anderson DE: Periapical tooth root infections in llamas and alpacas. Small Rum Res. 2006, 61: 235-240. 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Valentine BA, Martin JM: Prevalence of neoplasia in llamas and alpacas (Oregon State University, 2001–2006). J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007, 19: 202-204. 10.1177/104063870701900213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huggons NA, Bell RJW, Puchalski SM: Radiography and computed tomography in the diagnosis of nonneoplastic equine mandibular disease. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2011, 52: 53-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hathcock JT, Pugh DG, Cartee RE, Hammond L: Computed tomography of the llama head: technique and normal anatomy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1995, 36: 290-296. 10.1111/j.1740-8261.1995.tb00265.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Floyd MR: The modified Triadan system: nomenclature for veterinary dentistry. J Vet Dent. 1991, 8 (4): 18-19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dixon PM: Proceedings of AAEP Focus meeting on dentistry, Albuquerque. Dental Anatomy. 2011, 8-24.Google Scholar
- Concha-Albornoz I, Stieger-Vanegas SM, Cebra CK: Computed tomographic features of the osseous structures of the external acoustic meatus, tympanic cavity, and tympanic bulla of llamas (Lama glama). Am J Vet Res. 2012, 73: 42-52. 10.2460/ajvr.73.1.42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirkland KD, Baker GJ, Marretta SM, Eurell JA, Losonsky JM: Effects of aging on the endodontic system, reserve crown, and roots of equine mandibular cheek teeth. Am J Vet Res. 1996, 57: 31-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Windley Z, Weller R, Tremaine WH, Perkins JD: Two- and three-dimensional computed tomographic anatomy of the enamel, infundibulae and pulp of 126 equine cheek teeth. Part 1: Findings in teeth without macroscopic occlusal or computed tomographic lesions. Equine Vet J. 2009, 41: 433-440. 10.2746/042516409X390214.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saunders J, Windley Z: Equine Sinonasal and Dental. Veterinary Computed Tomography. Edited by: Schwarz T, Saunders J. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011:427-442.Google Scholar
- Dacre IT, Kempson PM, Dixon PM: Pathological studies of cheek teeth infections in the horse: 1. Normal endodontic anatomy and dentinal structure of equine cheek teeth. Vet J. 2008, 178: 311-320. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.09.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.